California (CA) — 6 bills IN SESSION · thru Aug 31
Last action: Jun 25, 2026 (4 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Employment: automated decision systems.
An act to add Part 5.5.5 (commencing with Section 1520) to Division 2 of the Labor Code, relating to employment.
Status: S: Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 9.) Ordered to the Assembly. (May 19, 2026)
Assessment: SB 947 defines 'worker' to explicitly include independent contractors, meaning owner-operators you dispatch through automated load-matching, performance-scoring, or deactivation systems are covered — the bill prohibits sole reliance on ADS for deactivation decisions and mandates human review, corroboration, and written post-use notices before removing a contractor from your network. If you use algorithmic tools to evaluate carrier performance, assign loads, or deactivate underperforming owner-operators, you must build a human review layer, document corroborating evidence, and provide detailed written disclosures — with $500 civil penalties per violation plus punitive damages and attorney's fees exposure in private suits. The broad 'employment-related decision' definition and Labor Commissioner enforcement authority make this a direct compliance burden on broker operations that rely on automated carrier management platforms.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers using algorithmic dispatch, performance scoring, or ADS-driven deactivation of owner-operators should oppose this bill and engage with CA legislators to seek exemptions or amendments clarifying its scope.
Last action: Jun 22, 2026 (7 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Employment: technological displacement: notice.
An act to add Article 3 (commencing with Section 1414) to Chapter 4 of Part 4 of Division 2 of the Labor Code, relating to employment.
Status: S: Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 9.) Ordered to the Assembly. (May 20, 2026)
Assessment: SB 951 explicitly includes independent contractors in its definition of 'worker,' meaning that if your business terminates a contract with owner-operators or carriers due to AI-driven automation or route optimization tools, you could face 90-day advance notice obligations, back-pay liability up to 60 days, and $500-per-day civil penalties for noncompliance. The bill's definition of 'technological termination of contract' — covering any contract termination substantially caused by AI or automation that displaces human workers — is broad enough to capture carrier dispatch technology or automated load-matching platforms that reduce reliance on contracted drivers. While the bill's primary target appears to be traditional employers, the explicit inclusion of contractors creates real compliance exposure for freight brokers adopting automation in their operations.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers that rely on contracted owner-operators should monitor this bill closely and engage through industry associations to clarify or narrow the definition of 'worker' to exclude arms-length carrier relationships.
Last action: Jun 22, 2026 (7 days ago)
6/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Workplace surveillance tools.
An act to add Part 5.8 (commencing with Section 1580) to Division 2 of the Labor Code, relating to employment.
Status: S: Referred to Coms. on P., D.T., & C.P. and L., P.E. & R. (Jun 22, 2026)
Assessment: AB 1883 broadly defines 'workplace surveillance tool' to include geolocation, audio/video, and continuous time-tracking systems, and critically defines 'worker' to include independent contractors — meaning owner-operators dispatched through your brokerage in California could be covered. The bill prohibits using these tools to infer protected-class information and bans emotion, gait, and (most) facial recognition technology, with civil penalties of up to $500 per employee per violation enforceable by the Labor Commissioner, public prosecutors, or individual workers. If your operations rely on GPS fleet tracking, ELD data, or similar monitoring of owner-operators hauling California loads, you should assess whether those systems fall within this bill's scope before it potentially advances to a floor vote ahead of the August 31, 2026 session end.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill to determine whether your use of geolocation tracking, telematics, or electronic logging tools for owner-operators could be characterized as workplace surveillance subject to California's enforcement authority.
Last action: May 14, 2026 (46 days ago)
6/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Workplace artificial intelligence tools.
An act to add Part 5.9 (commencing with Section 1600) to Division 2 of the Labor Code, relating to employment.
Assessment: AB 1898 defines 'worker' to explicitly include independent contractors, meaning owner-operators under contract with your brokerage could qualify — and any automated decision system you use to assign loads, set productivity quotas, evaluate performance, or manage scheduling could constitute a 'workplace AI tool' subject to 90-day advance written notice, detailed disclosures (including quota descriptions and job-impact timelines), and signed worker acknowledgment before deployment. Violations carry penalties up to $500 per worker per violation, enforceable by the Labor Commissioner, public prosecutors, or private civil action with punitive damages and attorney's fees. Your primary exposure is operational: if you use any AI-assisted dispatch, scoring, or monitoring platform affecting owner-operators, you would need to audit those systems, prepare multilingual disclosures, and halt deployment until signed notices are returned.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill closely if your brokerage uses AI-driven dispatch, load-matching, performance scoring, or route optimization tools that affect owner-operator assignments, as those systems may trigger mandatory disclosure and signed acknowledgment requirements.
Last action: Sep 13, 2025 (289 days ago)
6/10 SCORENEUTRAL
California Preventing Algorithmic Collusion Act of 2025.
An act to add Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 17370) to Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code, relating to business regulations.
Status: S: Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 10. Page 1470.) Ordered to the Assembly. (Jun 03, 2025)
Assessment: If your brokerage uses any algorithmic pricing or rate-recommendation tool — including AI-based load boards or dynamic freight pricing platforms — this bill requires you to disclose to owner-operators and carriers that their compensation rates are set or recommended by an algorithm, and prohibits using any such tool trained on competitor data. Violations of the competitor-data prohibition carry penalties of at least $10,000 per day or the total value of all transactions run through the offending algorithm, and disclosure failures carry $5,000 per day in civil penalties under Attorney General enforcement. The definition of 'pricing algorithm' is broad enough to capture standard freight rate tools, and the independent contractor disclosure requirement in Section 17375(a)(2) directly targets the broker-owner-operator pay relationship.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill closely and assess whether your load-matching or rate-recommendation tools use competitor pricing data, as violations could expose your business to significant civil penalties and mandatory disclosure obligations.
Last action: Sep 3, 2025 (299 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Employment: nonpayment of wages: complaints.
An act to amend Sections 98, 98.1, and 98.2 of the Labor Code, relating to employment.
Status: S: Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Smallwood-Cuevas. (Sep 03, 2025)
Assessment: This bill restructures the Labor Commissioner's wage complaint process and introduces two provisions directly relevant to your business: first, any award against a defendant now carries a mandatory 30% administrative fee deposited into a new Wage Recovery Fund, significantly increasing the financial exposure of any wage dispute outcome; second, if your business denies an employment relationship based on independent contractor classification, you are now explicitly required to demonstrate compliance with California's ABC test under Labor Code Section 2775, effectively embedding AB5 scrutiny into every wage complaint response. The current law sections provided were unreadable (web page code only), so a direct line-by-line comparison was not possible, but the bill's own strike-through and new language clearly establishes both the fee mechanism and the IC-classification burden as new procedural requirements.
Recommended action: Brokers operating in California should monitor this bill and consider engaging with industry associations to oppose the new 30% administrative fee and the requirement that IC-classification denials be substantiated under California's ABC test (AB5 standard).
Hawaii (HI) — 5 bills SESSION ENDED · May 8
Last action: Feb 17, 2026 (132 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Relating To Labor.
Clarifies the employment status of certain delivery drivers under state laws related to workers' compensation, wage and hour, temporary disability insurance, family leave, tax classification of business relationships, and unemployment insurance by establishing conditions under which delivery drivers are deemed employees of the business operating the delivery program. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
Status: H: Reported from LAB (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 285-26) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to JHA. / Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on JHA with Representative(s) Reyes Oda voting aye with reservations; Representative(s) Garcia, Muraoka, Pierick voting no (3) and Representative(s) Cochran, Lee, M., Poepoe excused (3). (Feb 17, 2026) · S: Referred to LBT, WAM. (Feb 02, 2026)
Assessment: This bill amends six Hawaii statutes — covering workers' compensation, wage and hour, temporary disability, family leave, unemployment insurance, and tax classification — to deem delivery drivers employees of any business that 'arranges, assigns, or dispatches' delivery work if two conditions are met: the driver must complete deliveries within set or algorithmically enforced timeframes, and the driver cannot decline assignments without penalty or deactivation. That dispatching-and-control trigger maps directly onto how logistics brokers coordinate owner-operators, meaning brokers who manage routing, timing, or assignment acceptance could be deemed the statutory employer of drivers they've classified as independent contractors. Any IC agreement covering drivers who meet both conditions is explicitly voided and unenforceable under each amended chapter, exposing your business to workers' comp claims, wage-and-hour liability, UI contributions, and tax reclassification simultaneously.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and freight companies that arrange, assign, or dispatch delivery work in Hawaii should engage against this bill, as it directly targets the dispatching function at the core of broker operations.
Last action: Feb 4, 2026 (145 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Relating To Private Sector Collective Bargaining Rights.
Expands under certain circumstances the types of employees protected by the Hawaii Employment Relations Act to include independent contractors and all individuals subject to the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Act of 1935.
Status: S: The committee on LBT deferred the measure. (Feb 04, 2026)
Assessment: This bill amends Hawaii's Employment Relations Act to extend collective bargaining protections — normally reserved for employees — to independent contractors and all NLRA-covered individuals whenever the National Labor Relations Board lacks a quorum for 30 or more days. For your business, this means your owner-operators could organize under Hawaii state labor law and assert collective bargaining rights against you during any federal enforcement gap, a trigger that has already been met in 2025. The practical effect is that a recurring federal dysfunction could intermittently reclassify the broker-carrier relationship in Hawaii, exposing you to unfair labor practice claims and union recognition demands under state law.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating in Hawaii should oppose this bill and engage with the Hawaii legislature to highlight how extending collective bargaining rights to independent contractors threatens the owner-operator model during any NLRB quorum gap.
Last action: Dec 8, 2025 (203 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Relating To Private Sector Collective Bargaining Rights.
Expands the types of employees protected by the Hawaii Employment Relations Act to include independent contractors and all individuals subject to the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Act.
Status: H: Introduced and Pass First Reading. / Referred to LAB, JHA, referral sheet 3 (Jan 23, 2025) · S: Reported from LBT (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 402) with recommendation of passage on Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referral to JDC. / Report adopted; Passed Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referred to JDC/WAM. / Re-Referred to LBT, JDC/WAM. (Feb 12, 2025)
Assessment: This bill amends Hawaii's Employment Relations Act by striking the exclusion of independent contractors from the definition of 'employee,' which directly threatens your ability to contract with owner-operators as ICs under Hawaii law. If enacted, owner-operators you engage in Hawaii could gain collective bargaining rights, unionize, and compel you to negotiate terms — fundamentally disrupting the flexible, market-based broker-carrier relationship. The bill also expands HERA coverage to all individuals subject to NLRA jurisdiction, removing the prior carve-out and broadening the pool of workers who could assert these rights against your business.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating in Hawaii should oppose this bill and engage with state legislators to prevent independent contractors from being swept into collective bargaining coverage under the Hawaii Employment Relations Act.
Last action: Mar 20, 2026 (101 days ago)
7/10 SCORESUPPORT
Relating To Health Care Plans For Workers.
Requires the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, in consultation with the Insurance Commissioner, to establish and implement a five-year voluntary Nontraditional Workforce Portable Health Care Benefit Plan Pilot Program that offers high deductible health plans or catastrophic health plans to nontraditional workers who are ineligible for health benefits provided by the Hawaii Employer-Union Health Benefits Trust Fund or prepaid health care plans under the Prepaid Health Care Act. Requires reports to the Legislature. Appropriates funds. Effective 7/1/3000. (HD1)
Status: H: Reported from LAB (Stand. Com. Rep. No. 1263-26) as amended in HD 1, recommending passage on Second Reading and referral to CPC. / Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on CPC with none voting aye with reservations; Representative(s) Shimizu voting no (1) and Representative(s) Quinlan excused (1). (Mar 20, 2026) · S: Report adopted; Passed Third Reading. Ayes, 25; Aye(s) with reservations: none . Noes, 0 (none). Excused, 0 (none). Transmitted to House. (Mar 10, 2026)
Assessment: This bill includes an explicit IC-protective provision stating that contributions to a portable health care benefit plan 'shall not be used as a criterion for determining a person's employment classification' and that internet or app-based company contributions shall not constitute evidence of an employment relationship for workers' comp, unemployment, or disability purposes — directly shielding broker-carrier arrangements from reclassification risk. The voluntary pilot program offers owner-operators and independent carriers access to high-deductible health plans or catastrophic plans without converting them into employees, which stabilizes your contractor workforce. Your primary watch item is ensuring the DLIR's administrative standards developed under subsection (b) do not introduce new classification factors or compliance burdens on hiring parties, including brokers.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating in Hawaii should support this bill and engage with DLIR during the pilot program's development to ensure owner-operators and gig-economy carriers can access portable benefits without triggering reclassification.
Last action: Dec 8, 2025 (203 days ago)
7/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Relating To Labor.
Establishes a Portable Benefits Program under the administration of a board of trustees to provide portable benefits to gig workers. Expands the Hawaii Retirement Savings Program to gig workers. Appropriates funds.
Status: H: Referred to LAB, FIN, referral sheet 4 (Jan 27, 2025)
Assessment: This bill targets 'contracting agents' — defined as entities that facilitate services paid via 1099 — and would require mandatory contributions to a portable benefits fund for workers' compensation, health insurance, paid time off, and retirement benefits, with a private cause of action if contributions are missed. The critical protection for brokers is Section -10, which explicitly states that contributions and benefits provided under this program shall not be used to determine employment status or an employment relationship under Hawaii's UI law (Chapter 383), preserving IC classification. However, the mandatory contribution requirement, compliance monitoring, board-imposed fees, and private lawsuit exposure create real financial and administrative burdens for any logistics broker or carrier platform operating in Hawaii that crosses the worker-count threshold.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill closely and engage with Hawaii legislators to ensure the IC status carve-out in Section -10 is strengthened and that contribution thresholds and rates are set at workable levels before the bill advances.
Iowa (IA) — 8 bills SESSION ENDED · May 3
Last action: Mar 31, 2026 (90 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
A bill for an act prohibiting the misclassification of employees as independent contractors, providing penalties, and including applicability provisions.
A bill for an act prohibiting the misclassification of employees as independent contractors, providing penalties, and including applicability provisions.
Status: H: Motion to invoke Rule 60 to place on Calendar, yeas 92, nays 0. H.J. 769. / Motion prevailed. H.J. 769. / Placed on calendar. H.J. 769. / Rereferred to Labor and Workforce. H.J. 784. (Mar 31, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates a new Iowa chapter (95) imposing civil penalties up to $10,000 per misclassified individual and class 'D' felony charges — up to five years confinement — on employers who willfully misclassify workers as independent contractors. Critically, the enforcement mechanism shifts the burden of proof onto the employer, meaning your business must affirmatively demonstrate compliance rather than the state proving a violation. The bill ties classification to IRS guidelines, which use a behavioral-control test that is more IC-friendly than an ABC test, but the felony exposure, per-worker penalty stacking, and reversed burden of proof create serious legal risk for brokers contracting with large numbers of owner-operators in Iowa.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should oppose this bill and engage Iowa legislators to highlight how criminal felony penalties and burden-shifting enforcement will disrupt legitimate owner-operator contracting in freight.
Last action: Mar 13, 2025 (473 days ago)
8/10 SCORESUPPORT
A bill for an act prohibiting the consideration of the deployment, implementation, or use of a motor carrier safety improvement when determining a person's employment status.(Formerly HSB 169.)
A bill for an act prohibiting the consideration of the deployment, implementation, or use of a motor carrier safety improvement when determining a person's employment status.(Formerly HSB 169.)
Status: H: SF 377 substituted. H.J. 648. / Withdrawn. H.J. 656. (Mar 13, 2025)
Assessment: This Iowa bill creates a statutory safe harbor by explicitly prohibiting courts and agencies from using a motor carrier's deployment of safety devices, software, training, or operational practices — including those required by contract — as evidence of an employment relationship under any state law. Without this protection, a carrier requiring an owner-operator to use ELD systems, dashcams, or safety protocols could be seen as exercising control, triggering reclassification risk. For your business, this means safety compliance requirements embedded in your broker-carrier contracts are less likely to be weaponized as evidence of joint employer status or misclassification in Iowa.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and carriers operating in Iowa should support this bill and encourage its passage, as it directly protects independent contractor arrangements from being undermined by safety compliance requirements.
Last action: Mar 10, 2025 (476 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
A bill for an act relating to employment status and employment benefits and including applicability provisions.
A bill for an act relating to employment status and employment benefits and including applicability provisions.
Status: S: Subcommittee: Driscoll, Taylor, and Townsend. S.J. 466. (Mar 10, 2025)
Assessment: This bill amends Iowa's workers' compensation, wage payment, minimum wage, and unemployment insurance statutes to define 'independent contractor' using a three-prong test — free from control, service outside the usual course of business or performed off-premises, and customarily engaged in an independent trade — and critically places the burden on the employer to prove IC status, not on the worker to prove employment. For owner-operators specifically, Section 4 restructures the existing safe harbor so that truckers must now satisfy this modified ABC-style definition rather than the prior conditions-based standard, making IC classification harder to defend and more litigation-exposed for brokers and carriers. The burden-shift provision alone represents a significant operational risk: in any dispute over owner-operator classification under Iowa workers' comp or UI law, your business must affirmatively prove IC status rather than a worker proving employment.
Recommended action: Brokers and carriers operating in Iowa should oppose this bill because it replaces the existing owner-operator safe harbor with a modified ABC-style test and shifts the burden of proof onto the employer to establish IC status.
Last action: Feb 28, 2025 (486 days ago)
8/10 SCORESUPPORT
A bill for an act prohibiting the consideration of the deployment, implementation, or use of a motor carrier safety improvement when determining a person's employment status.(See HF 698.)
A bill for an act prohibiting the consideration of the deployment, implementation, or use of a motor carrier safety improvement when determining a person's employment status.(See HF 698.)
Status: H: Committee report approving bill, renumbered as HF 698. (Feb 28, 2025)
Assessment: This bill creates a statutory safe harbor in Iowa by prohibiting any state-law employment classification analysis — including employee, independent contractor, or joint-employment determinations — from treating a motor carrier's safety requirements (ELDs, dashcams, training programs, operational policies, etc.) as evidence of employer control. Without this protection, plaintiffs and regulators routinely argue that a carrier's or broker's safety mandates in a transportation contract demonstrate the level of control that triggers an employment relationship. By removing safety-related directives from the factor analysis under all Iowa state laws, this bill directly shields your broker-carrier contracts from reclassification exposure tied to FMCSA-driven or contractually required safety compliance.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and motor carriers should support this bill and engage Iowa legislators to advance it, as it directly protects IC arrangements by preventing safety compliance requirements from being weaponized to reclassify owner-operators as employees.
Last action: Feb 19, 2025 (495 days ago)
8/10 SCORESUPPORT
A bill for an act prohibiting the consideration of the deployment, implementation, or use of a motor carrier safety improvement when determining a person's employment status.(See SF 377.)
A bill for an act prohibiting the consideration of the deployment, implementation, or use of a motor carrier safety improvement when determining a person's employment status.(See SF 377.)
Status: S: Committee report approving bill, renumbered as SF 377. (Feb 19, 2025)
Assessment: This Iowa bill creates an affirmative protection for motor carriers by explicitly prohibiting any safety-related device, software, training, policy, or operational practice from being considered when determining whether a driver is an employee, independent contractor, or jointly employed — under any state law. This directly shields your carrier partners from reclassification risk arising from safety mandates you or they impose, closing a litigation avenue plaintiffs' attorneys have used to argue that safety oversight equals control. For brokers who require carriers to use specific safety technology or follow safety protocols as contract conditions, this protection removes a key pressure point in IC misclassification claims.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and motor carriers should support this bill, as it prevents safety compliance requirements — such as ELDs, dashcams, training programs, or telematics — from being used as evidence of an employment relationship under Iowa law.
Last action: Feb 12, 2025 (502 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
A bill for an act prohibiting the misclassification of employees as independent contractors, providing penalties, and including applicability provisions.
A bill for an act prohibiting the misclassification of employees as independent contractors, providing penalties, and including applicability provisions.
Status: H: Introduced, referred to Labor and Workforce. H.J. 303. (Feb 12, 2025)
Assessment: This bill creates a new Iowa chapter (95) imposing civil penalties up to $10,000 per misclassified individual and Class D felony charges — up to five years imprisonment — on employers who 'willfully' classify workers as independent contractors rather than employees. The IRS multi-factor test determines classification status, and the burden of proof shifts to the employer to disprove a violation. For logistics brokers contracting with owner-operators in Iowa, this penalty structure — combined with reversed burden of proof and mandatory referral to county attorneys — significantly raises the legal and financial risk of your standard contractor model.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should engage Iowa legislators to oppose this bill, which creates felony criminal exposure and per-worker civil penalties for contractor arrangements that regulators deem misclassification.
Last action: Apr 3, 2025 (452 days ago)
7/10 SCORESUPPORT
A bill for an act providing for the regulation of delivery network companies and drivers, making penalties applicable, and including effective date provisions.(Formerly HF 7.)
A bill for an act providing for the regulation of delivery network companies and drivers, making penalties applicable, and including effective date provisions.(Formerly HF 7.)
Status: H: Referred to Commerce. H.J. 895. (Apr 03, 2025)
Assessment: Iowa HF 545 creates a new statutory chapter (321Q) governing delivery network companies and drivers, with Section 321Q.6 expressly stating that delivery network drivers 'shall be considered an independent contractor and shall not be considered an agent or employee' of the platform company — a meaningful codified protection against reclassification. The bill also establishes minimum financial liability coverage requirements ($50K/$100K/$25K) during the delivery service period, which your business should review if you operate or partner with last-mile delivery platforms in Iowa. Additionally, the bill carves delivery network companies and drivers out of Iowa's motor carrier regulatory definitions under Chapter 325A, reducing regulatory overlap but also clarifying that separate rules apply to this segment.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and carriers using gig-style delivery networks should support this bill, as it explicitly classifies delivery network drivers as independent contractors and shields companies from employer liability.
Last action: Feb 20, 2025 (494 days ago)
6/10 SCORESUPPORT
A bill for an act providing for the regulation of delivery network companies and drivers, making penalties applicable, and including effective date provisions.(See HF 545.)
A bill for an act providing for the regulation of delivery network companies and drivers, making penalties applicable, and including effective date provisions.(See HF 545.)
Status: H: Committee report approving bill, renumbered as HF 545. (Feb 20, 2025)
Assessment: This bill creates a new Iowa chapter (321Q) specifically for delivery network companies, and critically defines these companies as entities that do not 'control, direct, or manage' drivers except as agreed in a written contract — a structural protection for independent contractor status. Delivery network companies and drivers are explicitly excluded from Iowa's motor carrier definitions under Chapter 325A, removing them from that regulatory regime's obligations. The primary operational requirement is a tiered insurance mandate ($50K/$100K/$25K) that the company, driver, or both must maintain during delivery periods — a compliance cost your business should evaluate if you operate or contract with app-based delivery platforms in Iowa.
Recommended action: Brokers and carriers operating last-mile or gig-delivery platforms in Iowa should support this bill, as it explicitly carves delivery network companies and drivers out of Iowa's motor carrier regulatory framework and establishes written-contract-based independence between companies and drivers.
Louisiana (LA) — 5 bills SESSION ENDED · Jun 1
Last action: Mar 9, 2026 (112 days ago)
8/10 SCORESUPPORT
Provides for Occupational Accident Insurance for independent contractors. (gov sig)
Provides for Occupational Accident Insurance for independent contractors. (gov sig)
Status: S: Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations. (Mar 09, 2026)
Assessment: This Louisiana bill creates a four-condition safe harbor under R.S. 23:1061(B) that prevents a principal from being deemed a statutory employer — and therefore liable under workers' compensation — when the contractor holds a valid EIN, executes a written IC agreement, maintains occupational accident coverage meeting minimum standards ($1M medical, temporary disability, AD&D), and retains control over means and methods. Critically, R.S. 23:1061(C) explicitly names CDL owner-operators as eligible participants, making this directly applicable to your carrier relationships. Satisfaction of all four conditions creates a rebuttable presumption of independent contractor status, reducing your exposure to workers' comp claims and statutory employer liability in Louisiana.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers using CDL owner-operators in Louisiana should actively support this bill, as it creates a statutory safe harbor that shields principals from statutory employer liability when contractors carry occupational accident coverage.
Last action: May 22, 2026 (38 days ago)
7/10 SCOREENACTED
Creates the Independent Contractor Voluntary Portable Benefits Act
Creates the Independent Contractor Voluntary Portable Benefits Act
Status: H: Signed by the Governor. Becomes Act No. 299. / Effective date: 08/01/2026. (May 22, 2026) · S: Signed by the President of the Senate. (May 18, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates an explicit statutory firewall in Louisiana: contributions your business makes to an independent contractor's portable benefit account cannot be used as evidence of an employment relationship or employer liability under state workers' compensation or employment security law. That protection is directly relevant to brokers who want to offer voluntary benefits to owner-operators without triggering reclassification exposure. The opt-in, written-agreement requirement and the IC classification shield together make this a meaningful pro-broker safe harbor for benefit contributions.
Last action: May 15, 2026 (45 days ago)
7/10 SCOREENACTED
Provides relative to the definition of an independent contractor (EN DECREASE SD EX See Note)
Provides relative to the definition of an independent contractor (EN DECREASE SD EX See Note)
Status: H: Signed by the Governor. Becomes Act No. 133. / Effective date: 08/01/2026. (May 15, 2026) · S: Signed by the President of the Senate. (May 13, 2026)
Assessment: This Louisiana bill expands the workers' compensation definition of 'independent contractor' to include not just the primary contractor but also that contractor's own employees and any subcontractors they engage — a direct benefit to broker-carrier arrangements where owner-operators frequently sub out work or have their own workers. The existing provision already excludes truck tractor operations (fueling, driving, hooking trailers, inspections) from the 'manual labor' definition that would otherwise trigger workers' comp coverage, and this bill preserves that protection while extending IC status further down the chain. For your business, this means Louisiana carriers and their workers operating under your contracts have a stronger statutory basis to remain outside the workers' comp system, reducing potential liability exposure tied to your freight arrangements.
Last action: Mar 9, 2026 (112 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Provides relative to the use of automated decision systems with respect to employment decisions (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Provides relative to the use of automated decision systems with respect to employment decisions (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Status: H: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Labor and Industrial Relations. (Mar 09, 2026)
Assessment: This bill explicitly extends its coverage to independent contractors — defining 'worker' to include ICs and 'employment-related decision' to cover equivalent decisions made under a contractor relationship — meaning your use of AI or algorithmic tools for load assignment, route scoring, productivity quotas, or deactivation of owner-operators could trigger mandatory pre-use notices, human review requirements, data access rights, and appeal processes. If your brokerage or carrier operations use any computational scoring or dispatch optimization system that influences IC assignments, compensation, or deactivation, you would be required to appoint designated internal reviewers, maintain corroborating documentation, and provide workers 12 months of their own ADS-generated data upon request. Penalties and anti-retaliation provisions add enforcement teeth that create operational and legal exposure for brokers relying on automated tools to manage carrier performance.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers using algorithmic dispatch, load assignment, or performance-scoring tools should monitor this bill and engage Louisiana legislators to clarify or narrow its scope relative to independent contractor relationships.
Last action: May 25, 2026 (35 days ago)
5/10 SCOREENACTED
Requests the La. State Law Institute to study the feasibility of requiring employers to provide occupational accident insurance to independent contractors.
Requests the La. State Law Institute to study the feasibility of requiring employers to provide occupational accident insurance to independent contractors.
Status: S: Enrolled. Signed by the President of the Senate and sent to the Secretary of State by the Secretary of the Senate on 5/22/2026. (May 25, 2026)
Assessment: This resolution creates no immediate compliance obligation — it directs the Louisiana State Law Institute to study whether employers should be required to provide workers' compensation or occupational accident insurance to independent contractors, including owner-operators and 1099 workers in transportation and logistics. If the resulting legislative recommendations mandate that you, as a broker arranging freight, must provide or fund occupational accident coverage for contracted carriers and owner-operators, it could significantly increase your cost structure and blur the line between broker and employer. The study is a precursor to potential legislation, making it a critical early-stage opportunity to shape the outcome before a bill is drafted.
Massachusetts (MA) — 13 bills IN SESSION · thru Jul 31
Last action: Dec 18, 2025 (193 days ago)
9/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Preventing wage theft, promoting employer accountability, and enhancing public enforcement
For legislation to prevent wage theft, promote employer accountability, and enhance public enforcement. Labor and Workforce Development.
Status: H: House concurred (Feb 27, 2025) · S: Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on Senate Ways and Means (Dec 18, 2025)
Assessment: This bill creates joint and several liability between 'lead contractors' and downstream 'labor contractors' and 'labor subcontractors' for wage theft violations — a structure that maps directly onto the broker-carrier-owner-operator relationship, meaning your brokerage could be held fully liable for a carrier's or owner-operator's wage violations even when you had no knowledge or control. Separately, Sections 148F and 148G grant the Massachusetts Attorney General stop-work order authority that can halt all business operations at a specific location within 24 hours of a wage theft or UI coverage finding, with successor-entity provisions that prevent restructuring to escape the order. The treble damages provision in Section 27C further compounds financial exposure, making a single downstream contractor violation potentially catastrophic for your business.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating in Massachusetts should actively oppose this bill and engage with the MA Attorney General's office and industry associations to push back on joint-and-several liability and stop-work order provisions that directly threaten broker operations.
Last action: Nov 3, 2025 (238 days ago)
9/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Protecting labor and abolishing barriers to organizing rights
Relative to labor organizing rights. Labor and Workforce Development.
Status: H: Accompanied a new draft, see H4681 (Nov 03, 2025) · S: Senate concurred (Feb 27, 2025)
Assessment: This bill amends Chapter 150A to embed a three-prong ABC test for worker classification — requiring that a worker be free from control, perform work outside the hiring entity's usual business, and operate an independently established trade — making it significantly harder to maintain owner-operators as independent contractors under Massachusetts labor law. It also adds a broad joint employer definition covering any party with direct, indirect, or reserved control over terms and conditions of employment, which could expose your brokerage to liability for the labor practices of the carriers you contract with. Additionally, the bill makes it an unfair labor practice for an employer to misclassify employees as independent contractors, creating a new enforcement mechanism that could be used to challenge broker-carrier arrangements.
Recommended action: Engage your Massachusetts legislative contacts and industry associations to oppose this bill, as it directly threatens your ability to contract with independent owner-operators by codifying an ABC test and expanding joint employer liability under state labor law.
Last action: Aug 7, 2025 (326 days ago)
9/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Protecting labor and abolishing barriers to organizing rights
For legislation to protect labor relations and abolish barriers to organizing rights. Labor and Workforce Development.
Status: H: House concurred (Feb 27, 2025) · S: Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on Senate Ways and Means (Aug 07, 2025)
Assessment: This bill embeds a strict ABC test into Massachusetts labor law under Chapter 150A, meaning your owner-operators would be presumed employees unless you can prove all three prongs — free from your control, performing work outside your usual business, and independently established in that trade. It also introduces a sweeping joint employer definition based on any direct or indirect control over terms and conditions of employment, which could expose your brokerage to collective bargaining obligations for carriers you contract with. Additionally, the bill makes worker misclassification an explicit unfair labor practice with enforcement consequences, creating new legal risk every time you engage an independent owner-operator under your current contracting model.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should oppose this bill and engage Massachusetts legislative contacts to highlight the direct threat it poses to owner-operator contracting models.
Last action: Mar 26, 2026 (95 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
To prevent wage theft, promote employer accountability, and enhance public enforcement
Relative to wage theft, employer accountability, and public enforcement. Labor and Workforce Development.
Status: H: Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on House Ways and Means (Mar 26, 2026) · S: Senate concurred (Feb 27, 2025)
Assessment: This bill creates joint-and-several liability between 'lead contractors,' 'labor contractors,' and 'labor subcontractors' for wage theft violations — meaning if a carrier or owner-operator you hire fails to pay workers properly, your brokerage could be held equally liable for those unpaid wages, including treble damages. The bill also grants the Massachusetts Attorney General stop-work order authority for both UI violations and wage theft findings, which could halt your business operations at a specific location with as little as 24 hours' notice. The definitions of 'lead contractor' and 'labor contractor' are broad enough to sweep in freight brokers who arrange for carriers to perform transportation services that have a 'significant nexus' with your business operations.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating in Massachusetts should engage with state legislators to oppose this bill, particularly the joint-and-several liability provisions and stop-work order authority that could expose your business for the labor violations of carriers and subcontractors you contract with.
Last action: Mar 5, 2026 (116 days ago)
8/10 SCORESUPPORT
Relative to the definition of an independent contractor
Relative to individuals performing services. Labor and Workforce Development.
Status: H: Accompanied a study order, see H5180 (Mar 05, 2026) · S: Senate concurred (Feb 27, 2025)
Assessment: Massachusetts General Laws §148B currently uses a strict ABC test where all three prongs must be satisfied for a worker to be classified as an independent contractor — meaning a hiring entity must prove the worker is free from control, performs work outside the usual course of business, AND is customarily engaged in an independent trade. This bill changes the conjunctive 'and' between prongs to the disjunctive 'or,' meaning satisfying any one of the three prongs would be sufficient to establish IC status — a dramatic relaxation of one of the country's most restrictive classification standards. For your business, this directly reduces the risk that owner-operators you contract with in Massachusetts are reclassified as employees under state wage law, lowering your exposure to back wages, penalties, and misclassification liability.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and carriers operating in Massachusetts should actively support this bill, as it weakens the ABC test that currently threatens independent contractor arrangements.
Last action: Mar 5, 2026 (116 days ago)
8/10 SCORESUPPORT
Relative to independent contractors
Relative to independent contractors. Labor and Workforce Development.
Status: H: Accompanied a study order, see H5180 (Mar 05, 2026) · S: Senate concurred (Feb 27, 2025)
Assessment: This bill amends Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 149, Section 148B to restructure the ABC test by making prong (B) — that the service is performed outside the usual course of the employer's business — an 'or' condition rather than a mandatory requirement alongside prongs (A) and (C). Under current Massachusetts law, all three prongs must be satisfied for a worker to qualify as an independent contractor; this change means that owner-operators who are free from your control and are engaged in an independently established trucking business can qualify as ICs even if they haul freight in your core line of business. For logistics brokers who contract with owner-operators, this materially reduces reclassification risk under the state wage and hour laws that carry strict liability.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating in Massachusetts should actively support this bill, as it replaces the current strict conjunctive ABC test with a more flexible standard that allows IC status to be established through prongs (1) and (3) alone — without requiring that the work be performed outside the usual course of your business.
Last action: Feb 26, 2026 (123 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Establishing protections and accountability for Delivery Network Company workers, consumers, and communities
For legislation to establish protections and accountability for Delivery Network Company workers, consumers, and communities. Labor and Workforce Development.
Status: H: House concurred (Feb 27, 2025) · S: Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on Senate Ways and Means (Feb 26, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates a statutory presumption that application-based delivery workers are employees under Massachusetts General Laws (consistent with the existing ABC test in M.G.L. c. 149 §148B), directly threatening the independent contractor model used by delivery network operators. It mandates minimum wage floors for both assigned and standby time, mileage reimbursement at up to 150% of the IRS standard rate, $1M/$3M per-occurrence liability insurance coverage, detailed payroll data reporting to the Attorney General and Department of Labor Standards, and triple damages for retaliation — all enforced under Chapter 149's existing penalty framework. Any broker or carrier using an app-based dispatch model for last-mile or on-demand delivery in Massachusetts faces immediate reclassification exposure and significant new compliance costs if this passes.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and carriers operating app-based or platform-dispatched delivery networks in Massachusetts should actively oppose this bill and engage legislative contacts before its January 2026 effective date.
Last action: Feb 2, 2026 (147 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Establishing protections and accountability for DNC workers, consumers, and communities
Relative to protections and accountability for transportation network and delivery network companies workers, consumers, and communities. Financial Services.
Status: H: Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on House Ways and Means (Feb 02, 2026) · S: Senate concurred (Feb 27, 2025)
Assessment: This bill explicitly presumes application-based delivery workers are employees under Massachusetts General Laws c. 149 §148B — the same ABC test standard that already makes IC classification extremely difficult in MA — which would directly threaten last-mile and delivery network contractor models your business may rely on or compete alongside. Beyond reclassification, the bill imposes minimum wage floors (up to 150% of basic minimum wage for assigned time), IRS-rate mileage reimbursements, mandatory $1M/$3M liability insurance per worker during working time, detailed payroll data reporting to the AG and Department of Labor Standards, and triple-damages anti-retaliation enforcement. While this bill targets delivery network companies rather than freight brokers directly, its employee-presumption framework and enforcement mechanisms set a precedent that could expand to owner-operator and carrier arrangements in future Massachusetts legislation.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and delivery network operators in Massachusetts should oppose this bill and engage with the legislature to prevent an employee-presumption mandate that would eliminate independent contractor arrangements for app-based delivery workers.
Last action: Dec 18, 2025 (193 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Consolidating multiple definitions of employee to prevent misclassification
For legislation to consolidate multiple definitions of employee. Labor and Workforce Development.
Status: H: House concurred (Feb 27, 2025) · S: Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on Senate Ways and Means (Dec 18, 2025)
Assessment: This bill expands Massachusetts' strict ABC test — currently embedded in Chapter 149, Section 148B — into the workers' compensation statute (Chapter 152) by cross-referencing the 148B definition of 'employee' for all purposes under workers' comp. For your business, this means that owner-operators you contract with in Massachusetts could be reclassified as employees under workers' comp using the ABC test's prong B, which presumes employment unless the work is outside your usual course of business — a nearly impossible bar to clear in freight brokerage. The consolidation also signals a legislative push to apply this expanded definition across additional statutes, increasing your exposure to multi-agency enforcement and audits.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating in Massachusetts should engage with their state trade associations to oppose this bill, as it extends the ABC test misclassification standard into workers' compensation law.
Last action: Nov 3, 2025 (238 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Protecting labor and abolishing barriers to organizing rights
Protecting labor and abolishing barriers to organizing rights
Status: H: Reported from the committee on Labor and Workforce Development / New draft of H2086 / Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on House Ways and Means (Nov 03, 2025)
Assessment: This bill inserts a three-prong ABC test into Chapter 150A's definition of 'employee,' meaning your owner-operators must satisfy all three prongs — including that their work falls outside your usual course of business — to retain independent contractor status under MA labor law. It also defines 'joint employer' as any party with direct or indirect control, or even reserved authority to control, any term or condition of employment, which could expose brokers to liability for carrier labor practices. Additionally, the bill makes it an unfair labor practice to misclassify workers as independent contractors, creating an enforcement hook that could be used against broker-carrier arrangements.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should oppose this bill and engage MA legislative contacts, as it embeds an ABC test into the state labor relations act and creates an expansive joint employer standard that directly threatens your owner-operator contracting model.
Last action: Dec 11, 2025 (200 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Relative to wage theft and due process
For legislation relative to wage theft and due process. Labor and Workforce Development.
Status: H: House concurred (Feb 27, 2025) · S: Accompanied a study order, see S2843 (Dec 11, 2025)
Assessment: This bill creates two new stop-work order authorities — one through the AG under Section 148G for wage theft violations, and one through the Department of Unemployment Assistance under Section 148F for unpaid UI contributions — that could be directed at any 'employing unit,' a term broad enough to implicate brokers if a carrier's owner-operators are ever reclassified as employees. The bill's definition of 'wage theft' incorporates Section 148B, which is Massachusetts' existing independent contractor misclassification statute using an ABC test, meaning any broker whose carriers or drivers are found misclassified could face stop-work orders halting their operations, fines up to $25,000, and civil suits brought by as few as three workers. Your exposure is compounded by the successor-liability provision, which can extend a stop-work order to your business if you share principals with a cited entity or engage in equivalent trade activity.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating in Massachusetts should monitor this bill closely and engage with the legislature to ensure broker-carrier IC arrangements are not swept into its stop-work and wage theft enforcement mechanisms.
Last action: Apr 30, 2026 (60 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Protecting warehouse workers
For legislation to protect warehouse workers. Labor and Workforce Development.
Status: H: House concurred (Feb 27, 2025) · S: Reporting date extended to Thursday July 30, 2026 (Apr 30, 2026)
Assessment: This bill's definition of 'employer' explicitly includes independent contractors and third-party entities that 'exercise control over wages, hours, or working conditions' of 100+ warehouse workers, making brokers who arrange freight at large distribution centers potentially subject to joint and several liability for quota compliance. If your owner-operators or contracted carriers work at covered warehouse distribution centers (NAICS codes 493, 423, 424, 454110, or 492110), your business could be drawn into enforcement actions, civil penalties, and $10,000-per-violation retaliation damages as a co-employer. The bill is currently warehouse-worker focused but the broad entity definitions create real exposure for brokers arranging last-mile or drayage at large fulfillment and distribution facilities.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill closely and engage with industry associations to push back on the broad 'employer' definition that sweeps in brokers and independent contractors as jointly and severally liable parties.
Last action: Mar 12, 2026 (109 days ago)
6/10 SCORESUPPORT
Establishing portable benefit accounts for app-based-delivery drivers
For legislation to establish portable benefit accounts for app-based-delivery drivers. Financial Services.
Status: H: Accompanied a study order, see H5206 (Mar 12, 2026) · S: Senate concurred (Feb 27, 2025)
Assessment: This bill explicitly declares that app-based delivery drivers 'retain full control over where, when, and how they perform app-based services/work and are therefore classified as independent contractors,' providing a statutory affirmation of IC status that could serve as a protective precedent for your business model. The trade-off is a 4% quarterly earnings contribution mandate into portable benefit accounts and a requirement to purchase occupational accident insurance with at least $1,000,000 aggregate coverage — real compliance costs for delivery network companies. The bill is narrowly scoped to app-based delivery (within 50 miles, using passenger vehicles, bicycles, etc.) and does not appear to sweep in over-the-road freight carriers or traditional logistics brokers, but companies operating last-mile or gig-style delivery platforms in Massachusetts face direct regulatory obligations.
Recommended action: Brokers and freight companies that operate app-based delivery platforms in Massachusetts should monitor this bill and engage in support, as it explicitly codifies independent contractor status for app-based delivery drivers while creating a structured benefits framework that avoids reclassification.
Maryland (MD) — 4 bills SESSION ENDED · Apr 13
Last action: Apr 13, 2026 (77 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Fraud Prevention, Prevailing Wage, and Living Wage - Prohibitions, Penalties, and Enforcement
Prohibiting a person from knowingly making or using, or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement resulting in underpayments of unemployment insurance contributions or payment of unemployment insurance benefits of more than $15,000 in a calendar year; altering the enforcement mechanisms related to workplace fraud laws, living wage laws, and prevailing wage laws, including authorizing the Attorney General to investigate and bring suit in a certain manner; etc.
Status: S: Favorable with Amendments Report by Finance / Favorable with Amendments {943726/1 / Motion Laid Over (Senator Jennings) Adopted (Apr 13, 2026)
Assessment: This bill strengthens Maryland's workplace fraud enforcement regime by expanding Attorney General authority to investigate and sue for misclassification violations, raising civil penalties up to $10,000 per misclassified worker with one-third paid directly to affected individuals, and adding joint-and-several liability for general contractors — a structure that could extend to broker-arranged freight relationships. The bill also increases penalties for repeat violators up to $20,000 per worker and broadens the Maryland False Claims Act to cover unemployment insurance fraud, adding another enforcement layer targeting independent contractor arrangements. If your business contracts with owner-operators in Maryland, the combination of AG-initiated litigation authority, treble damages, and successor-entity liability provisions creates materially higher misclassification risk than under current law.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and carriers using owner-operators in Maryland should monitor this bill and engage with the Attorney General's expanded enforcement authority over worker misclassification, as it directly increases legal and financial exposure for independent contractor arrangements.
Last action: Apr 13, 2026 (77 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Fraud Prevention, Prevailing Wage, and Living Wage - Prohibitions, Penalties, and Enforcement
Prohibiting a person from knowingly making or using, or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement resulting in underpayments of unemployment insurance contributions or payment of unemployment insurance benefits of more than $15,000 in a calendar year; altering the enforcement mechanisms related to workplace fraud laws, living wage laws, and prevailing wage laws, including authorizing the Attorney General to investigate and bring suit in a certain manner; etc.
Status: H: Third Reading Passed (98-36) (Apr 06, 2026) · S: Rereferred to Finance / Favorable with Amendments Report by Finance / Favorable with Amendments {133121/1 / Motion Special Order until Later Today (Senator Ready) Rejected / Committee Amendment {133121/1 Adopted / Favorable with Amendments Adopted / Second Reading Passed with Amendments (Apr 13, 2026)
Assessment: This bill significantly escalates Maryland's misclassification enforcement framework: it increases civil penalties up to $10,000 per misclassified worker (with one-third paid directly to the affected individual), authorizes treble damages, and grants the Attorney General independent authority to investigate and sue employers for workplace fraud and prevailing wage violations. The new joint-and-several liability provision for general contractors on construction projects — covering subcontractors with no direct contractual relationship — sets a precedent that could be extended to broker-carrier arrangements in future enforcement actions. Brokers operating in Maryland who contract with owner-operators should assess their classification practices now, as expanded AG enforcement authority and escalating per-worker penalties raise the financial stakes of any misclassification finding.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and motor carriers using independent owner-operators should monitor this bill closely and oppose provisions that expand misclassification penalties, extend joint-and-several liability to general contractors, and grant the Attorney General new investigative and litigation authority over workplace fraud violations.
Last action: Feb 3, 2026 (146 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Maryland Department of Labor - Investigation of Complaints - Requirements (Worksite Enforcement Act of 2026)
Requiring the Maryland Department of Labor to establish certain procedures for receiving, reviewing, and investigating certain complaints regarding matters under the jurisdiction of the Department; requiring the Department to employ one investigators for each of five regions of the State to investigate complaints; and requiring, beginning fiscal year 2027, the Governor to include in the annual budget bill an appropriation of $500,000 for the hiring of five investigators.
Status: H: Hearing 2/12 at 2:00 p.m. (Feb 03, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates a dedicated Maryland Department of Labor enforcement infrastructure — five regional investigators with a $500,000 annual appropriation — specifically tasked with investigating worker misclassification complaints, with a mandatory 14-day response deadline for those complaints. The site-check authority and power to request payroll records and worker classification documentation directly expose brokers who use owner-operators in Maryland to elevated audit and investigation risk. While the bill does not redefine classification standards itself, it materially increases enforcement capacity and speed against existing misclassification complaints, raising the operational risk for your Maryland broker and carrier relationships.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating in Maryland should monitor this bill and consider engaging to limit how 'worker misclassification' complaints are prioritized and investigated against broker-carrier arrangements.
Last action: Jan 19, 2026 (161 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Recipients of Economic Development Assistance or State Contracts - Certification of Compliance With State Labor Laws
Requiring certain persons that receive certain State economic development assistance to make a certification each year that the person was not the subject of a certain final adverse determination and is not currently failing to comply with certain outstanding requirements under a prior final judgment or order; requiring a certain unit of State government to initiate a pause on disbursements or approvals of certain economic development assistance or the award or renewal of certain State contracts; etc.
Status: H: Hearing 2/17 at 1:00 p.m. (Jan 19, 2026)
Assessment: This bill requires any company holding $250,000 or more in aggregate Maryland state procurement contracts to certify annually that it has not received a final adverse determination for violations of state labor obligations — which explicitly include misclassification under the covered Labor and Employment Article subtitles. If your business uses independent owner-operators and a state agency finds misclassification, that determination could trigger a pause on new contract awards, renewals, and economic development disbursements until corrective actions are fully completed. The de minimis exception (under $5,000, no willfulness or misclassification finding, paid within 30 days) provides limited relief, but the explicit carve-out preserving the pause for misclassification findings makes this a direct operational risk for brokers doing business with Maryland state agencies.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers holding $250,000 or more in aggregate Maryland state procurement contracts should track this bill and engage to ensure misclassification findings do not trigger a pause on contract awards or renewals.
Michigan (MI) — 7 bills IN SESSION · thru Dec 31
Last action: Sep 24, 2025 (278 days ago)
9/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Employment security: administration; determination of whether services performed by an individual are employment; modify. Amends sec. 42 of of 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1 (MCL 421.42).
Employment security: administration; determination of whether services performed by an individual are employment; modify. Amends sec. 42 of of 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1 (MCL 421.42).
Status: H: Bill Electronically Reproduced 09/18/2025 (Sep 24, 2025)
Assessment: This bill amends Michigan's Employment Security Act to add a three-prong ABC test — effective January 1, 2026 — requiring that any individual performing services be classified as an employee unless they are a separate business entity or satisfy all three criteria: free from control, performing work outside the hiring entity's usual course of business, and customarily engaged in an independent trade or business. For logistics brokers, the 'outside the usual course of business' prong (Part B, criterion ii) is the critical threat — arranging freight transportation is core to your business, meaning owner-operators you contract with would almost certainly fail this prong and be reclassified as employees for UI tax purposes. The bill is also retroactive to January 1, 2021, creating potential back-liability for UI contributions on contractor relationships you believed were compliant under the prior IRS 20-factor test.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should oppose this bill and engage Michigan legislative contacts immediately, as it would impose an ABC test on owner-operator classifications for unemployment insurance purposes starting January 1, 2026.
Last action: May 14, 2025 (411 days ago)
9/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Labor: fair employment practices; various employer requirements; provide for. Amends secs. 1, 7, 11, 13, 13a, 14, 15, 18 & 19 of 1978 PA 390 (MCL 408.471 et seq.) & adds secs. 13c & 13d.
Labor: fair employment practices; various employer requirements; provide for. Amends secs. 1, 7, 11, 13, 13a, 14, 15, 18 & 19 of 1978 PA 390 (MCL 408.471 et seq.) & adds secs. 13c & 13d.
Status: S: Reported Favorably With Substitute (s-1) 5/13/2025 / Referred To Committee Of The Whole With Substitute (s-1) (May 14, 2025)
Assessment: This bill introduces a strict three-pronged ABC test in Michigan's Wage Payment Act — to qualify as an independent contractor, the worker must be free from your control, perform work outside your usual course of business, AND be customarily engaged in an independently established trade. The second prong (work outside usual course of business) is nearly impossible for brokers to satisfy, since arranging freight transportation is core to your business. New Section 13c places the burden of proof on you to disprove employee status, and violations expose you to misclassification penalties — putting your entire owner-operator network at legal and financial risk.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should actively oppose this bill and engage Michigan legislators, as it imposes an ABC test for independent contractor classification that would directly threaten your owner-operator contracting model.
Last action: Apr 17, 2025 (438 days ago)
9/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Labor: hours and wages; penalties and remedies for misclassification of independent contractors; provide for. Amends secs. 1, 13, 15, 18 & 19 of 1978 PA 390 (MCL 408.471 et seq.) & adds secs. 13c & 13d.
Labor: hours and wages; penalties and remedies for misclassification of independent contractors; provide for. Amends secs. 1, 13, 15, 18 & 19 of 1978 PA 390 (MCL 408.471 et seq.) & adds secs. 13c & 13d.
Status: H: Bill Electronically Reproduced 04/16/2025 (Apr 17, 2025)
Assessment: This bill encodes an ABC test into Michigan's Payment of Wages and Fringe Benefits Act — all three prongs must be satisfied for a worker to qualify as an independent contractor, meaning owner-operators who perform work within your 'usual course of business' (freight brokerage or trucking) will almost certainly be reclassified as employees. The enforcement package is severe: civil penalties jump from $1,000 to $10,000 per violation, exemplary damages triple to 3x unpaid wages and benefits, a 100% annual penalty accrues from the date a complaint is filed, and misclassification itself becomes a criminal misdemeanor. A new rebuttable-presumption provision in Section 13c shifts the burden of proof onto your business to disprove an employment relationship, and the department is required to notify Treasury and the Unemployment Insurance Agency of every violation — triggering cascading tax and UI liability exposure.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and carriers operating in Michigan should actively oppose this bill and engage trade associations to lobby against its passage, as it directly threatens the owner-operator contracting model.
Last action: Jun 24, 2026 (5 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Labor: fair employment practices; use of electronic monitoring or automated decisions tools by an employer; prohibit except for certain purposes. Creates new act.
Labor: fair employment practices; use of electronic monitoring or automated decisions tools by an employer; prohibit except for certain purposes. Creates new act.
Status: S: Introduced By Senator Darrin Camilleri / Referred To Committee On Labor (Jun 24, 2026)
Assessment: This bill explicitly defines 'employee' to include independent contractors who provide services to or through an employer, meaning your owner-operators fall squarely within its scope. Before using any routing optimization, load-matching algorithm, telematics, or dispatch tool that touches a covered individual, you would be required to obtain written consent, conduct annual third-party impact assessments, submit those assessments to a state registry, and restrict data collection to narrowly defined purposes — with civil penalties for violations. The near-total ban on automated employment-related decisions (Section 4) combined with the sweeping data prohibitions in Section 5(4) could effectively bar common broker operational tools like AI-driven load assignment, productivity scoring, and GPS tracking of contracted carriers.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should oppose this bill and engage Michigan legislative contacts, as it directly regulates automated and electronic monitoring tools used on independent contractors and creates significant compliance costs and liability exposure.
Last action: Feb 26, 2026 (123 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Labor: fair employment practices; use of electronic monitoring or automated decisions tools by an employer; prohibit except for certain purposes. Creates new act.
Labor: fair employment practices; use of electronic monitoring or automated decisions tools by an employer; prohibit except for certain purposes. Creates new act.
Status: H: Bill Electronically Reproduced 02/24/2026 (Feb 26, 2026)
Assessment: This bill explicitly defines 'employee' to include independent contractors who provide services to or through an employer, meaning the owner-operators and carriers you contract with could be treated as 'covered individuals' subject to all consent, notice, data restriction, and impact assessment requirements. Load-matching algorithms, dispatch tools, performance scoring systems, and GPS or telematics monitoring you use today would likely qualify as 'automated decisions tools' or 'electronic monitoring tools' — each requiring written consent from covered individuals, annual third-party impact assessments, and submission of those assessments to a public state registry before use. The broad prohibition on collecting productivity, geolocation, and device-usage data, combined with civil penalties and enforcement by the Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity, creates significant operational and compliance exposure for brokers relying on data-driven freight matching and carrier performance management.
Recommended action: Brokers should engage with Michigan legislators to seek exemptions or clarifications that exclude owner-operator monitoring tools and dispatch/load-matching algorithms from coverage under this act.
Last action: May 7, 2026 (53 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Labor: fair employment practices; requirement for an employee to access or respond to work-related communications outside of usual work hours; prohibit. Creates new act.
Labor: fair employment practices; requirement for an employee to access or respond to work-related communications outside of usual work hours; prohibit. Creates new act.
Status: S: Introduced By Senator Erika Geiss / Referred To Committee On Labor (May 07, 2026)
Assessment: This Michigan bill explicitly defines 'employee' to include independent contractors who provide services to or through an employer, which means your owner-operators could be covered and you could be prohibited from requiring them to respond to load offers, dispatch communications, or scheduling messages outside their self-defined 'hours of availability.' Violations carry fines of up to $500 per incident plus mandatory overtime compensation at 1.5x the contractor's hourly rate equivalent — a direct financial exposure for brokers who need real-time responsiveness from carriers. The freight brokerage model depends on rapid communication with owner-operators to cover loads, and this bill's inclusion of independent contractors in its coverage creates meaningful operational and legal risk if enacted as written.
Recommended action: Brokers should monitor this bill closely and engage with industry associations to clarify that owner-operators and independent contractors operating their own businesses should be excluded from the employee-facing restrictions.
Last action: Apr 17, 2025 (438 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Individual income tax: administration; information for taxpayers regarding the classification of an individual as an independent contractor; incorporate in instruction booklet and provide notice to certain taxpayers. Amends sec. 471 of 1967 PA 281 (MCL 206.471) & adds sec. 707a.
Individual income tax: administration; information for taxpayers regarding the classification of an individual as an independent contractor; incorporate in instruction booklet and provide notice to certain taxpayers. Amends sec. 471 of 1967 PA 281 (MCL 206.471) & adds sec. 707a.
Status: H: Bill Electronically Reproduced 04/16/2025 (Apr 17, 2025)
Assessment: This bill requires Michigan's Department of Treasury to insert a misclassification awareness page into the annual income tax instruction booklet and — critically — to send a direct notice to every individual listed on a 1099-MISC filed with the state, explaining worker classification rules and providing contact information for the Wage and Hour Division and Attorney General to report suspected misclassification. For brokers paying Michigan-based owner-operators, every Form 1099-MISC you file triggers a government-issued notice to that contractor actively directing them to report 'payroll fraud' if they believe they've been misclassified. While the bill does not itself change the classification standard or impose new penalties, it is designed to increase misclassification enforcement referrals and complaint volume by turning routine tax administration into a targeted outreach campaign aimed at your independent contractors.
Recommended action: Brokers should monitor this bill and consider opposing it, as it funnels misclassification complaint reporting directly to enforcement agencies for every 1099-MISC recipient your business pays in Michigan.
Minnesota (MN) — 17 bills SESSION ENDED · May 18
Last action: Apr 1, 2025 (454 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Rebuttable presumption that in individual is an employee establishment
Rebuttable presumption that in individual is an employee establishment
Status: S: Introduction and first reading / Referred to Jobs and Economic Development (Apr 01, 2025)
Assessment: This bill amends Minnesota's unemployment insurance law to establish a rebuttable presumption that every trucking operator is an employee — meaning your owner-operators are presumed employees unless you can affirmatively prove all seven enumerated factors are met, including written IC contracts, equipment ownership, cost responsibility, and substantial control over means and manner. The burden shift is the critical change: under current law, employment status is determined by applying workers' comp and UI tests; under this bill, you start in a losing position and must overcome the presumption. If your carrier relationships cannot satisfy every one of the seven factors simultaneously, those operators will be treated as employees for UI purposes, exposing your business and your carriers to back taxes, benefits liability, and audit risk.
Recommended action: Engage with Minnesota legislators and industry associations to oppose this bill, which shifts the burden of proof against independent contractor status for trucking operators.
Last action: Mar 23, 2026 (98 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Independent contractors and payors added to the centralized work reporting system, and payors required to report independent contractors to the centralized work reporting system.
Independent contractors and payors added to the centralized work reporting system, and payors required to report independent contractors to the centralized work reporting system.
Status: H: Committee report, to adopt as amended / Second reading (Mar 23, 2026)
Assessment: This bill expands Minnesota's new-hire reporting system to require payors — a category that explicitly includes any person or entity paying an independent contractor for services — to report each newly engaged independent contractor to the state within 20 days, using W-9 or equivalent documentation. For logistics brokers contracting with owner-operators in Minnesota, this creates a direct administrative reporting obligation for every new carrier relationship, with civil penalties of $25 per unreported contractor (second violation) or $500 per contractor if noncompliance is deemed a conspiracy. The definition of 'independent contractor' is broad enough to capture owner-operators earning $600 or more annually, meaning virtually every broker-carrier engagement would trigger a reporting duty effective January 1, 2026.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating in Minnesota should monitor this bill and engage with legislators to understand compliance costs, as it would require you to report every independent contractor (owner-operator) you engage to the state's centralized work reporting system within 20 days of hiring.
Last action: Mar 5, 2026 (116 days ago)
7/10 SCORESUPPORT
Certain individuals working in transportation occupations exempted from Minnesota Paid Leave Law.
Certain individuals working in transportation occupations exempted from Minnesota Paid Leave Law.
Status: H: Author added Allen (Mar 05, 2026)
Assessment: This bill carves out two categories of workers from Minnesota's Paid Leave Law: (1) individuals in DOT-regulated positions under 49 U.S.C. § 31502 — which covers commercial motor vehicle drivers subject to federal hours-of-service rules — and (2) employees of businesses classified under SIC codes 4212-01 through 4231-02, the Motor Freight Transportation and Warehousing sector, which directly covers your operations. If enacted, carriers and brokers in those SIC classifications would not be required to provide paid leave coverage to their employees, eliminating associated payroll contribution and administrative obligations under Chapter 268B. Note that independent contractors are already excluded from covered employment under existing law, so the new value here is the exemption for W-2 employees in your industry.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and motor freight carriers operating in Minnesota should support this bill, as it directly reduces your compliance burden under the Minnesota Paid Leave Law by exempting DOT-regulated transportation workers and employees of SIC-coded motor freight and warehousing businesses.
Last action: Mar 2, 2026 (119 days ago)
7/10 SCORESUPPORT
Minnesota Paid Leave Law exemption for certain individuals working in transportation occupations
Minnesota Paid Leave Law exemption for certain individuals working in transportation occupations
Status: S: Introduction and first reading / Referred to Jobs and Economic Development (Mar 02, 2026)
Assessment: This bill carves out two new exemptions from Minnesota's Paid Leave Law that directly benefit your operations: workers subject to DOT hours-of-service authority under 49 U.S.C. § 31502, and all employees of businesses classified under Motor Freight Transportation and Warehousing SIC codes 4212-01 through 4231-02. If your carrier or brokerage falls within those SIC codes, your workforce would no longer be 'covered employment' under the paid leave mandate, eliminating the associated premium contributions and administrative compliance burden. The opt-in provision preserves flexibility for entities that choose coverage, but the default exemption is a meaningful cost and compliance reduction for freight operations.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and motor freight carriers operating in Minnesota should support this bill, as it explicitly exempts DOT-regulated transportation workers and motor freight/warehousing employees (SIC 4212-01 through 4231-02) from Minnesota Paid Leave Law obligations.
Last action: Mar 10, 2025 (476 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Independent contractors and payors addition to the centralized work reporting system; payors to report independent contractors to the centralized work reporting system requirement
Independent contractors and payors addition to the centralized work reporting system; payors to report independent contractors to the centralized work reporting system requirement
Status: S: Introduction and first reading / Referred to Health and Human Services (Mar 10, 2025)
Assessment: This bill requires payors — including logistics brokers who contract with independent owner-operators — to report every newly engaged independent contractor earning $600 or more per year to Minnesota's centralized work reporting system within 20 calendar days of engagement, using W-9 or equivalent documentation. The bill converts what was previously a voluntary reporting option for private payors into a mandatory obligation, backed by civil penalties of $25 per unreported contractor (second violation) or $500 per contractor if noncompliance involves a conspiracy to withhold or falsify reports. If your brokerage regularly engages Minnesota-based owner-operators, you will need a systematic process to capture contractor start dates, submit timely reports, and avoid penalty exposure beginning January 1, 2026.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers doing business in Minnesota should monitor this bill and engage with the legislative process to understand compliance costs and push back on the mandatory reporting burden it creates.
Last action: Apr 15, 2026 (75 days ago)
6/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Transportation network company drivers collective bargaining rights establishment and regulation provisions
Transportation network company drivers collective bargaining rights establishment and regulation provisions
Status: S: Introduction and first reading / Referred to Labor (Apr 15, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates a mandatory collective bargaining regime specifically for transportation network company (TNC/rideshare) drivers in Minnesota, requiring covered TNCs to negotiate with certified exclusive representatives over compensation, hours, and terms and conditions of work — with civil penalties up to $10,000 per day for non-compliance. The bill is explicitly scoped to TNCs as defined under Minnesota Statutes section 65B.472, which governs rideshare platforms like Uber and Lyft, not freight brokers or motor carriers. However, the collective bargaining infrastructure and precedent established here — treating gig-economy independent contractors as a bargainable workforce without reclassifying them as employees — could be a legislative template that migrates to trucking and freight brokerage in future sessions.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill closely to assess whether its collective bargaining framework for TNC drivers could be expanded or used as a legislative model affecting freight owner-operators in Minnesota.
Last action: Apr 9, 2026 (81 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Use of automated decision systems in employment settings regulation
Use of automated decision systems in employment settings regulation
Status: S: Comm report: To pass as amended and re-refer to Judiciary and Public Safety / Pursuant to Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 6, referred to Rules and Administration (Apr 09, 2026)
Assessment: This bill defines 'worker' to explicitly include independent contractors and 'employer' broadly to cover entities that exercise control over 'access to work or job opportunities' — language that could sweep in brokers who use automated load boards, carrier scoring systems, or dispatch algorithms to assign freight. If your business uses any computational tool that scores, ranks, or recommends which owner-operators receive load offers, you would face mandatory pre-use disclosure to affected contractors, affirmative written consent requirements, 36-month data retention obligations, worker rights to request and correct AI-generated data, and impact assessment duties with potential civil enforcement. While the bill targets an employment context, its deliberate inclusion of independent contractors makes compliance exposure real for brokers operating in Minnesota who rely on algorithmic carrier selection or performance management tools.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should monitor this bill and engage with Minnesota legislators, as its broad definitions of 'employer' and 'worker' explicitly cover independent contractors and would impose notice, consent, recordkeeping, and impact-assessment obligations on brokers who use any AI-driven load matching, performance scoring, or routing tools.
Last action: Apr 7, 2026 (83 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Use of electronic monitoring tools regulation in employment settings
Use of electronic monitoring tools regulation in employment settings
Status: S: Comm report: To pass as amended and re-refer to State and Local Government (Apr 07, 2026)
Assessment: This bill defines 'electronic monitoring tool' broadly to include geolocation, movement tracking, and automated decision systems — tools that brokers and carriers routinely use for dispatch, safety compliance, and load tracking. Critically, the definition of 'worker' explicitly includes independent contractors, meaning your owner-operators would be covered, triggering mandatory 30-day pre-use notices, written consent, opt-out rights, and data retention obligations for monitoring tools you already deploy. The compliance burden — notice filings with the Minnesota Commissioner of Labor and Industry, 36-month data retention, and worker correction rights tied to employment-related decisions — could directly disrupt how you manage freight operations and contractor performance.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers using ELDs, geolocation, or AI-driven dispatch tools should engage against this bill or seek exemptions for legitimate fleet monitoring practices.
Last action: Mar 18, 2026 (103 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Use of automated decision systems in employment settings regulated.
Use of automated decision systems in employment settings regulated.
Status: H: Introduction and first reading, referred to Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy (Mar 18, 2026)
Assessment: This bill explicitly extends its coverage to independent contractors — the definition of 'worker' includes 'an independent contractor providing service to or through an employer,' and 'employment-related decision' covers equivalent decisions made about contractors, meaning AI tools brokers use to assign loads, score carriers, set rates, or monitor driver performance could trigger notice, consent, audit, and recordkeeping mandates. If your company uses any automated scoring, routing, or performance-evaluation system that affects owner-operators, you would need to provide 30-day pre-use written notice, obtain affirmative consent, maintain 36 months of data records, and submit copies of notices to the Minnesota Commissioner of Labor and Industry within 10 days. The opt-out provision — requiring you to offer alternatives to the automated system where 'reasonable alternatives exist' — could directly disrupt AI-driven dispatch and carrier selection workflows.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers using AI-based load matching, performance scoring, or driver monitoring tools should engage with this bill and advocate for exemptions or narrowed definitions that exclude broker-carrier contracting platforms.
Last action: Apr 2, 2025 (453 days ago)
6/10 SCORESUPPORT
Certain individuals working in positions regulated by the United States Department of Transportation exempted from earned sick and safe time requirements provision
Certain individuals working in positions regulated by the United States Department of Transportation exempted from earned sick and safe time requirements provision
Status: S: Introduction and first reading / Referred to Labor (Apr 02, 2025)
Assessment: This bill adds a new exemption to Minnesota's earned sick and safe time law, carving out any individual in a position regulated by DOT under 49 U.S.C. § 31502 — the federal statute governing qualifications and hours of service for commercial motor vehicle operators. If enacted, drivers and owner-operators in DOT-regulated roles would not be covered employees under Minnesota's ESST statute, eliminating any obligation for carriers or brokers treating those workers as employees to track or provide paid sick leave accrual. The practical benefit is reduced administrative burden and legal exposure for motor carrier operations in Minnesota.
Recommended action: Brokers and carriers should support this bill as it reduces compliance exposure by exempting DOT-regulated positions — including owner-operators and drivers — from Minnesota's earned sick and safe time mandates.
Last action: Apr 2, 2025 (453 days ago)
6/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Collective bargaining rights for transportation network company drivers created and regulated, and rulemaking authorized.
Collective bargaining rights for transportation network company drivers created and regulated, and rulemaking authorized.
Status: H: Introduction and first reading, referred to Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy (Apr 02, 2025)
Assessment: This bill creates a formal collective bargaining regime for transportation network company (TNC) drivers in Minnesota — rideshare platforms specifically — granting drivers rights to organize, negotiate terms and conditions of work, and file unfair labor practice charges against TNCs. While the bill targets rideshare drivers (defined under Minn. Stat. § 65B.472) rather than freight carriers or owner-operators, the union infrastructure, mandatory negotiation obligations, and lockout prohibitions it establishes could be a template for future legislation targeting gig-based freight and last-mile delivery platforms you use. If your business relies on app-based dispatch or digital freight matching in Minnesota, this bill's expansion potential warrants attention even though it does not directly regulate your operations today.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill closely, as its collective bargaining framework for TNC drivers could establish a precedent that expands to freight and last-mile carriers operating through digital dispatch platforms.
Last action: Apr 1, 2025 (454 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Biennial misclassification fraud impact report requirement and appropriation
Biennial misclassification fraud impact report requirement and appropriation
Status: S: Comm report: To pass as amended and re-refer to Taxes (Apr 01, 2025)
Assessment: This bill requires Minnesota's Intergovernmental Misclassification Enforcement and Education Partnership agencies to produce annual reports estimating misclassification rates by industry, which explicitly feeds enforcement prioritization — meaning freight and logistics could be flagged as a high-risk sector and draw increased audits from the Department of Labor and Industry, Department of Revenue, and Department of Employment and Economic Development. The reporting framework also quantifies fiscal impacts to unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, and tax collections, building the evidentiary foundation that Minnesota agencies typically use to justify expanded enforcement campaigns against independent contractor arrangements. While this bill does not itself impose new classification standards or penalties, it funds and institutionalizes a surveillance and targeting infrastructure that poses a downstream risk to your owner-operator contracting model.
Recommended action: Brokers should monitor this bill and engage with Minnesota legislators to ensure trucking and owner-operator arrangements are not disproportionately targeted as enforcement priorities are shaped by these reports.
Last action: Mar 13, 2025 (473 days ago)
6/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Individual income and corporate franchise taxes, property taxes, local government aids, sales and use taxes, tax increment financing, special local taxes, and other various taxes and tax-related provisions modified; various tax refunds and credits modified; reports required; and money appropriated.
Individual income and corporate franchise taxes, property taxes, local government aids, sales and use taxes, tax increment financing, special local taxes, and other various taxes and tax-related provisions modified; various tax refunds and credits modified; reports required; and money appropriated.
Status: H: Introduction and first reading, referred to Taxes (Mar 13, 2025)
Assessment: This broad Minnesota omnibus tax bill explicitly includes a provision providing 'nonconformity to certain worker classification rules,' which could directly affect how owner-operators and independent carriers are classified under state tax law. Depending on the direction of that nonconformity — whether it adopts a stricter ABC-style test or rejects a more expansive federal classification standard — it could either protect or threaten your broker-carrier contracting model. The remainder of the bill covers property taxes, sales taxes, and other provisions with no direct bearing on freight broker operations.
Recommended action: Monitor the worker classification nonconformity provision to determine whether it restricts or expands Minnesota's ability to reclassify independent contractors used in freight operations.
Last action: Mar 10, 2025 (476 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Annual reports from partnership entities of the Intergovernmental Misclassification Enforcement and Education Partnership required, and money appropriated.
Annual reports from partnership entities of the Intergovernmental Misclassification Enforcement and Education Partnership required, and money appropriated.
Status: H: Introduction and first reading, referred to Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy (Mar 10, 2025)
Assessment: This bill requires Minnesota's Intergovernmental Misclassification Enforcement and Education Partnership agencies — including Labor and Industry, Revenue, and DEED — to produce annual industry-by-industry misclassification rate estimates explicitly designed to 'guide partnership enforcement priorities,' with appropriations funding that analysis. While the bill does not change the classification test itself, it builds a government-funded enforcement targeting infrastructure that could direct audits and penalties toward industries — like freight and trucking — where independent contractor arrangements are common. The practical risk to your business is that owner-operator relationships you rely on could be flagged as high-misclassification industries, increasing your exposure to coordinated multi-agency enforcement actions in Minnesota.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating in Minnesota should monitor this bill and engage with the legislature to ensure trucking and owner-operator arrangements are not swept into misclassification enforcement priorities identified by these reports.
Last action: Mar 5, 2025 (481 days ago)
6/10 SCORESUPPORT
Individuals working in positions regulated by the United States Department of Transportation exempted from earned sick and safe time requirements.
Individuals working in positions regulated by the United States Department of Transportation exempted from earned sick and safe time requirements.
Status: H: Introduction and first reading, referred to Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy (Mar 05, 2025)
Assessment: This bill adds a new exemption to Minnesota's earned sick and safe time law, excluding any individual in a position where the U.S. DOT has authority to set qualifications and maximum hours of service under 49 U.S.C. § 31502 — which directly covers commercial motor vehicle drivers subject to federal hours-of-service ru
les. For your business, this means that drivers operating under DOT authority would no longer need to be tracked or accounted for under Minnesota's mandatory paid sick leave framework, simplifying compliance for carriers and brokers arranging freight in or through the state. The practical impact is a reduction in leave accrual recordkeeping obligations for DOT-regulated driver positions, though the bill does not affect the underlying independent contractor vs. employee classification question.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and carriers operating in Minnesota should support this bill, as it removes DOT-regulated drivers from the state's earned sick and safe time mandates, reducing administrative and compliance burdens tied to driver scheduling and leave tracking.
Last action: Mar 13, 2025 (473 days ago)
5/10 SCORESUPPORT
Certain information provided by businesses when determining worker classification requirement provision
Certain information provided by businesses when determining worker classification requirement provision
Status: S: Introduction and first reading / Referred to Labor (Mar 13, 2025)
Assessment: This bill amends Minnesota Stat. 181.725 to require 'partnership entities' — likely state agencies or workforce bodies — to provide businesses with classification-relevant information, including UI, workers' comp, and tax ID data, upon request. For logistics brokers, this could reduce misclassification risk by giving you a documented, agency-supported basis for IC determinations involving owner-operators. The bill does not impose new compliance burdens or expand the classification test itself, making it a modest procedural benefit rather than a structural change.
Recommended action: Brokers should monitor this bill and consider supporting it, as it creates a mechanism to help businesses obtain the information needed to properly document independent contractor classification decisions.
Last action: Feb 24, 2025 (490 days ago)
5/10 SCORESUPPORT
Commercial transportation provisions modification
Commercial transportation provisions modification
Status: S: Introduction and first reading / Referred to Transportation (Feb 24, 2025)
Assessment: This bill creates a state-funded CDL training assistance program that subsidizes tuition, living expenses, and motor carrier reimbursement for training new commercial drivers — directly addressing the driver shortage that constrains your carrier capacity. Registered employers, including motor carriers, can receive reimbursement for in-house CDL training costs, which could benefit carriers in your network. The employment requirement (one year with a registered employer) could limit award recipients from quickly transitioning to independent owner-operator status, which is worth monitoring for its downstream effect on your contractor pipeline.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and motor carriers should engage with this bill to ensure the CDL training assistance program is structured to support owner-operators and small carriers who train their own drivers.
Missouri (MO) — 6 bills SESSION ENDED · May 15
Last action: May 15, 2026 (45 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Creates new provisions relating to employment practices involving warehouse distribution centers
Creates new provisions relating to employment practices involving warehouse distribution centers
Status: H: Referred: Emerging Issues(H) (May 15, 2026)
Assessment: This bill defines 'employer' broadly to include any entity that 'indirectly, or through an independent contractor' exercises control over wages, hours, or working conditions at a qualifying warehouse distribution center — and makes all such parties jointly and severally liable for compliance. If your brokerage arranges freight or labor at Missouri warehouse facilities covered under NAICS codes 493, 423, 424, or 454110, you could be swept in as a responsible employer subject to quota disclosure, recordkeeping, and anti-retaliation mandates. The bill's primary operational burden falls on warehouse operators, but the explicit inclusion of independent contractors in the employer definition creates meaningful exposure for brokers with warehouse distribution center relationships.
Recommended action: Brokers who operate or contract with warehouse distribution centers in Missouri should monitor this bill and consider opposing provisions that impose joint and several liability on entities using independent contractors or staffing arrangements.
Last action: Mar 10, 2026 (111 days ago)
6/10 SCORESUPPORT
Establishes the Delivery Network Company Insurance Act and establishes the standards and requirements for motor vehicle liability insurance coverage
Establishes the Delivery Network Company Insurance Act and establishes the standards and requirements for motor vehicle liability insurance coverage
Status: H: HCS Reported Do Pass (H) - AYES: 8 NOES: 1 PRESENT: 1 (Mar 10, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates Missouri's Delivery Network Company Insurance Act, which statutorily defines delivery network company drivers as independent contractors 'for all purposes' — a direct protection against reclassification claims in this segment. It mandates minimum liability coverage of $50,000/$100,000 bodily injury and $25,000 property damage during delivery and availability periods, with the platform's insurer serving as backstop when a driver's personal policy lapses. If your business arranges last-mile or app-based delivery using personal vehicles, this framework clarifies your insurance obligations and limits exposure, but the coverage minimums and mandatory disclosure requirements do add compliance steps to driver onboarding.
Recommended action: Brokers operating or contracting with delivery network companies in Missouri should support this bill, as it explicitly codifies independent contractor status for drivers and establishes clear insurance frameworks that reduce ambiguity in liability disputes.
Last action: Feb 24, 2026 (125 days ago)
6/10 SCORESUPPORT
Modifies provisions relating to insurance coverage for certain delivery network companies
Modifies provisions relating to insurance coverage for certain delivery network companies
Status: S: Hearing Conducted S Insurance and Banking Committee (Feb 24, 2026)
Assessment: This Missouri bill creates a dedicated insurance framework for app-based delivery platforms, explicitly classifying delivery network company drivers as independent contractors — not employees — and stating that the platform does not control or direct drivers unless agreed to by written contract, both of which are favorable protections for broker-style operations. The bill mandates minimum liability coverage ($50K/$100K/$25K) that the platform or driver must maintain during active and availability periods, clarifying who bears primary liability when driver coverage lapses. If your operation uses a digital network to connect customers with independent delivery drivers in Missouri, this bill directly governs your insurance obligations and IC classification exposure.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and freight platforms using app-based delivery drivers should support this bill as it codifies independent contractor status for delivery network drivers and limits platform liability by clarifying insurance responsibilities across delivery periods.
Last action: Feb 11, 2026 (138 days ago)
6/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Modifies provisions relating to workers' compensation
Modifies provisions relating to workers' compensation
Status: S: Hearing Conducted S General Laws Committee (Feb 11, 2026)
Assessment: This bill lowers the causation threshold for compensable injuries from 'prevailing factor' to 'substantial factor,' which expands the range of claims that qualify under Missouri workers' comp — a change that could affect your carriers and any employment classification disputes involving owner-operators. Critically, Section 287.020 preserves the existing exclusion for owner-operators of leased motor vehicles contracting with for-hire carriers, which protects the core broker-carrier independent contractor model. Section 287.043 also reaffirms case law defining 'owner' in ways favorable to treating owner-operators as non-employees, but the broader loosening of causation standards warrants attention if any of your operations involve workers who could be reclassified as employees.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill closely because it reinstates a broader workers' comp standard that could affect how owner-operator exclusions and injury causation are interpreted in Missouri freight operations.
Last action: Apr 15, 2026 (75 days ago)
5/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Modifies provisions relating to workers' compensation
Modifies provisions relating to workers' compensation
Status: H: Executive Session Completed (H) / Voted Do Pass (H) / Reported Do Pass (H) - AYES: 6 NOES: 2 PRESENT: 0 / Taken Up for Third Reading (H) / Third Read and Passed (H) - AYES: 86 NOES: 62 PRESENT: 1 / Reported to the Senate and First Read (S) (Feb 09, 2026) · S: Executive Session Held (S) / SCS Voted Do Pass (S) (Apr 15, 2026)
Assessment: This Missouri workers' comp bill explicitly excludes owner-operators of motor vehicles leased or contracted to for-hire carriers from the definition of 'employee' under §287.020 — a provision that directly protects your independent contractor arrangements from workers' comp claims. The bill's primary changes tighten causation standards (requiring the accident to be the 'prevailing factor' in causing injury, disability, AND need for treatment) and add PTSD coverage for first responders, neither of which materially affects broker operations. The owner-operator carve-out is the only provision directly relevant to your business, and it runs in your favor.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill to confirm whether the owner-operator exclusion in §287.020 is preserved as written, since it directly protects your broker-carrier model from workers' comp liability.
Last action: Jan 27, 2026 (153 days ago)
5/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Modifies provisions relating to workers' compensation
Modifies provisions relating to workers' compensation
Status: S: Second Read and Referred S General Laws Committee (Jan 27, 2026)
Assessment: This Missouri workers' compensation overhaul retains the existing statutory exclusion in §287.020(1) that explicitly removes owner-operators who lease or contract their motor vehicle to a for-hire motor carrier — operating under a DOT or MoDOT certificate — from the definition of 'employee,' which is a meaningful protection for your broker-carrier contracting model. The bill's primary changes tighten compensability standards (adding a 'traumatic event' threshold for accidents, strengthening the 'prevailing factor' causation requirement, and adding a new prong requiring the employee to be engaged in work activity to the greater benefit of the employer), none of which directly expand liability onto brokers. The most relevant exposure for your business is indirect: if carriers or owner-operators face increased workers' comp costs or disputes under the revised standards, it could affect their operating costs and your contracted rates, but this bill does not reclassify contractors or create new broker liability.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill for any final provisions that could affect how Missouri workers' compensation law applies to owner-operators you contract with, particularly the retained exclusion of leased motor vehicle owner-operators from the definition of 'employee.'
New Jersey (NJ) — 10 bills IN SESSION · thru Dec 31
Last action: Jan 13, 2026 (167 days ago)
9/10 SCORESUPPORT
Declares Department of Labor and Workforce Development new rules concerning employment status test for independent contractors inconsistent with legislative intent.
Declares Department of Labor and Workforce Development new rules concerning employment status test for independent contractors inconsistent with legislative intent.
Status: S: Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Labor Committee (Jan 13, 2026)
Assessment: This resolution invokes New Jersey's constitutional legislative review authority to block proposed NJDOL rules at N.J.A.C. 12:11 that would have weaponized the existing ABC test against independent contractor arrangements by treating standard business tools — such as digital applications, insurance requirements, and professional licensure — as evidence of employer control, and by declaring drivers' own vehicles part of a company's 'place of business,' eliminating a key IC pathway for transportation network and freight arrangements. If those proposed rules had taken effect, your use of owner-operators in New Jersey could have triggered reclassification under the ABC test across unemployment compensation, wage-and-hour, and gross income tax laws simultaneously. This resolution gives the NJDOL 30 days to withdraw or amend the rules, and preserves the Legislature's authority to invalidate them outright — a clear pro-IC outcome your business should monitor closely and vocally support.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and carriers operating in New Jersey should actively support this resolution, as it directly blocks proposed NJDOL rules that would have made it significantly harder to classify owner-operators as independent contractors.
S2782 / A1511
RECENT ACTIVITY
Last action: Jun 18, 2026 (11 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Clarifies choice of independent contractor status for certain licensed or regulated professionals.
Clarifies choice of independent contractor status for certain licensed or regulated professionals.
Status: S: Motion To Sa (Schepisi) / Motion To Table Sa (24-13) (Ruiz) / Passed by the Senate (34-2) (Jun 18, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates a written-agreement-based IC safe harbor that explicitly protects port and marine terminal freight drivers under R.S.43:21-19(i)(7)(X), but critically excludes last-mile delivery drivers — leaving your owner-operators who handle final-mile work fully exposed to NJ's upcoming restrictive ABC Test rule taking effect October 1. The bill's narrow scope means it does not address the core operational threat to logistics brokers in New Jersey, and with the port trucking provision reportedly being removed, the bill may offer no meaningful protection for your contractor relationships at all. The real fix your business needs is separate legislation that repeals the ABC Test framework and nullifies the DOL rulemaking — this bill does not accomplish that.
Recommended action: Brokers should oppose this bill in its current form and push for broader legislation that cancels the NJ DOL's October 1 ABC Test rule and restores independent contractor protections for last-mile delivery drivers.
Last action: Feb 5, 2026 (144 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Establishes Office of Labor Law Enforcement.
Establishes Office of Labor Law Enforcement.
Status: S: Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Labor Committee (Feb 05, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates a dedicated Office of Labor Law Enforcement within the NJ Department of Labor, explicitly charged with coordinating enforcement against misclassification of employees — and it self-funds through penalties collected, creating a financial incentive to pursue violations aggressively. The office's jurisdiction covers wage and hour laws, unemployment compensation, temporary disability, and workers' compensation, all of which become enforcement flashpoints if your owner-operator relationships are scrutinized under NJ's existing ABC test framework. The co-location of deputy attorneys general with department enforcement staff signals a more coordinated and better-resourced prosecution posture, raising the litigation and penalty exposure risk for brokers contracting with independent carriers in New Jersey.
Recommended action: Brokers operating in New Jersey should monitor this bill and engage with the NJ DOL to ensure enforcement priorities under the new office do not disproportionately target owner-operator arrangements in the freight sector.
Last action: Jan 13, 2026 (167 days ago)
7/10 SCORESUPPORT
Revises test for employment or independent contractor status under certain State labor laws.
Revises test for employment or independent contractor status under certain State labor laws.
Assessment: This bill amends R.S.43:21-19 — the core definitional section of NJ's Unemployment Compensation Law — to revise the test used to determine whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor, which directly affects whether your owner-operators trigger UI contribution obligations. NJ currently applies a strict ABC test under this statute, and Republican sponsorship of a bill explicitly titled to 'revise' that test strongly signals a move toward a more contractor-friendly standard such as a behavioral-control or common law test. The operative classification language was truncated before the specific replacement test could be confirmed, so brokers should obtain the full enrolled version and verify that the new test removes or relaxes all three ABC prongs before committing lobbying resources.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill closely and engage with sponsors to confirm it replaces NJ's ABC test with a control-based or common law standard, then mobilize support if confirmed.
Last action: Jan 13, 2026 (167 days ago)
7/10 SCORESUPPORT
Revises factors for determining employment or independent contractor status under certain State labor laws.
Revises factors for determining employment or independent contractor status under certain State labor laws.
Status: S: Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Labor Committee (Jan 13, 2026)
Assessment: This bill amends New Jersey's unemployment compensation statute (R.S.43:21-19) to revise the factors used to determine employee vs. independent contractor status — directly affecting how your owner-operator relationships are evaluated under state UI law. NJ currently applies an ABC test, and a Republican-sponsored bill 'revising factors' strongly signals a move toward a more permissive, control-based standard that would make it easier to maintain IC classifications. The bill's operative language was truncated in the version reviewed, so confirm the final factor structure before committing resources to a support position.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill closely and engage your NJ legislative contacts to confirm the revised classification factors replace or loosen NJ's current ABC test, then actively support its passage if confirmed.
Last action: Jan 13, 2026 (167 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Establishes system for portable benefits for workers who provide services to consumers through contracting agents.
Establishes system for portable benefits for workers who provide services to consumers through contracting agents.
Status: S: Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Labor Committee (Jan 13, 2026)
Assessment: This bill requires any 'contracting agent' that uses a digital marketplace network — defined broadly as any online-enabled platform facilitating services between workers and consumers — to contribute at least 15% of each worker's monthly earnings into a portable benefits account, covering workers' comp, health insurance, paid time off, and retirement. If your load board, digital dispatch platform, or brokerage portal qualifies as a 'digital marketplace network' and your owner-operators are paid via 1099, you could be captured by this mandate and face private lawsuits for noncompliance. Section 8 attempts to preserve IC status for benefit purposes, but the 15% contribution mandate and enforcement fee structure still impose significant new financial and administrative burdens on covered contracting agents.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating digital freight platforms in New Jersey should oppose this bill and engage with the NJ Legislature to clarify that freight broker-carrier arrangements are excluded from its scope.
Last action: Jun 28, 2026 (yesterday)
6/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Establishes fee on certain employers that employ individuals who receive health benefits coverage through State Medicaid program.
Establishes fee on certain employers that employ individuals who receive health benefits coverage through State Medicaid program.
Status: S: Reported from Senate Committee with Amendments, 2nd Reading (Jun 28, 2026)
Assessment: This bill imposes a tiered annual fee — $325 to $725 per person — on NJ employers with 50 or more workers or their dependents enrolled in Medicaid, and critically, it places the burden on the employer to prove independent contractor status under the NJ unemployment statute (R.S.43:21-19) to avoid counting owner-operators toward that threshold. If your brokerage has NJ-based W-2 staff whose household members rely on Medicaid, you could face significant per-head fees plus up to $500 per day in penalties for nonpayment. The IC exclusion is a limited safeguard — owner-operators you contract with should not count — but misclassification findings under the statutory test could expose you to both the fee and separate misclassification penalties under P.L.2019, c.373.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill closely and consult legal counsel to determine whether your NJ carrier or brokerage operations meet the 50-employee Medicaid enrollment threshold that triggers the per-person fee.
Last action: Mar 10, 2026 (111 days ago)
6/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Requires certain disclosures by providers of commercial financing.
Requires certain disclosures by providers of commercial financing.
Status: S: Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Commerce Committee (Jan 13, 2026)
Assessment: This bill requires providers and brokers of commercial financing — explicitly including factoring transactions — to disclose APR, finance charges, total repayment amounts, and fee structures to recipients at the time of a specific offer. If your brokerage arranges or facilitates factoring deals for carriers, or if you act as a financing broker connecting carriers to capital, you would fall under the definition of 'broker' and face mandatory disclosure requirements in a form prescribed by the NJ Commissioner of Banking and Insurance. The bill is not directly about freight brokerage operations but could create compliance burdens for brokers involved in carrier payment financing, freight factoring arrangements, or working capital products.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill closely, as its disclosure requirements for factoring transactions and commercial financing brokers may impose new compliance obligations on brokers who arrange freight financing or factoring arrangements for carriers.
Last action: Jun 23, 2026 (6 days ago)
5/10 SCORESUPPORT
Establishes list of essential employees for purposes of travel during state of emergency.
Establishes list of essential employees for purposes of travel during state of emergency.
Assessment: This bill creates a voluntary registration program allowing private entities to submit their employees, independent contractors, and volunteers to a state essential employee list that grants travel access during declared emergencies — directly applicable to freight carriers and owner-operators moving critical goods during weather events or disasters. The definition of 'essential employee' explicitly includes independent contractors performing work deemed necessary to protect critical infrastructure, which aligns squarely with freight and logistics operations. Your business should monitor rulemaking to understand the submission process and ensure your contracted owner-operators are registered before the next declared emergency disrupts NJ operations.
Recommended action: Brokers and carriers should register eligible owner-operators and drivers with the NJ Office of Emergency Management to protect operational continuity during declared emergencies.
A3968 / S1677
RECENT ACTIVITY
Last action: Jun 1, 2026 (28 days ago)
5/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Establishes fully autonomous vehicle pilot program.
Establishes fully autonomous vehicle pilot program.
Status: S: Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Transportation Committee (Jan 13, 2026)
Assessment: This bill establishes a five-year NJ pilot program for fully autonomous vehicles, including commercial trucks, with direct implications for freight operations: autonomous commercial trucks must operate on designated highways under speed and weight restrictions set by the DOT, and testers must carry at least $5 million in liability insurance or a surety bond. The platooning provision is notable — it authorizes Level 5 autonomous trucks following a lead vehicle without a human driver, which could eventually reshape owner-operator dynamics in your carrier network. While this is a pilot program with limited immediate operational impact, the liability, insurance minimums, and operator-licensing requirements are worth tracking as AV freight deployment in NJ evolves.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill for how autonomous commercial truck provisions — particularly platooning rules and the $5M insurance/surety bond requirement — may affect carrier and broker operations as AV technology enters the freight market.
New York (NY) — 11 bills SESSION ENDED · Jun 5
Last action: Mar 30, 2026 (91 days ago)
9/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Empowers the commissioner of labor to issue stop-work orders against employers for misclassification of employees as independent contractors or for providing false, incomplete, or misleading information to an insurance company on the number of employees of such employer.
Empowers the commissioner of labor to issue stop-work orders against employers for misclassification of employees as independent contractors or for providing false, incomplete, or misleading information to an insurance company on the number of employees of such employer.
Status: S: PASSED SENATE / DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY (Mar 30, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates a direct operational threat: the New York Commissioner of Labor could issue a stop-work order halting all business operations at every worksite where a misclassification violation is found, with only a 72-hour window to come into compliance before the order takes effect. Non-compliance carries penalties of $1,000–$5,000 per day, and the order binds successor entities — meaning you cannot restructure your way out of liability. Although the 2025-26 legislative session ended June 6, 2026 without passage, this bill's enforcement mechanism — including mandatory employee back-pay during the shutdown period and anti-retaliation presumptions — represents a severe escalation of misclassification risk for brokers relying on independent owner-operators in New York.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers using owner-operators in New York should oppose this bill and engage trade associations to push back against its stop-work order mechanism before any future session reintroduction.
Last action: Jan 7, 2026 (173 days ago)
9/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Relates to the employee status of an individual; establishes criteria for determining whether labor or services performed for remuneration qualify as employment.
Relates to the employee status of an individual; establishes criteria for determining whether labor or services performed for remuneration qualify as employment.
Assessment: This bill amends New York's Labor Law and Workers' Compensation Law to impose a three-prong ABC test — requiring hiring entities to prove the worker is free from control, performs work outside the usual course of business, and is independently established — across unemployment insurance, minimum wage, wage and hour, and workers' comp statutes simultaneously. For logistics brokers, prong B is the critical threat: because your owner-operators haul freight, which is the usual course of your brokerage business, you almost certainly cannot satisfy that prong and would face reclassification exposure under four separate statutes at once. Note that New York's 2026-27 legislative session ended June 6, 2026, so this bill did not advance this term, but it will likely be reintroduced and warrants active monitoring.
Recommended action: Engage your state trucking association and legal counsel to oppose this bill, as it would impose an ABC test across New York labor law that directly threatens your owner-operator contracting model.
Last action: Jan 7, 2026 (173 days ago)
9/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Relates to the employee status of an individual; establishes criteria for determining whether labor or services performed for remuneration qualify as employment.
Relates to the employee status of an individual; establishes criteria for determining whether labor or services performed for remuneration qualify as employment.
Status: S: REFERRED TO LABOR (Jan 07, 2026)
Assessment: This bill imposes a strict ABC test across New York's Labor Law (unemployment insurance, minimum wage/hours) and Workers' Compensation Law, creating a presumption of employment for anyone providing labor or services for remuneration — placing the burden on your business to prove all three prongs: (A) the worker is free from your control in fact and contract, (B) the work is outside your usual course of business, and (C) the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade. Owner-operators hauling freight arranged by your brokerage would almost certainly fail prong B — since arranging transportation is your core business — meaning they would be reclassified as employees under UI, wage-hour, and workers' comp statutes simultaneously. If passed, this would force New York-based brokers to restructure carrier relationships statewide or face exposure to back taxes, benefit obligations, and penalty assessments across multiple regulatory agencies.
Recommended action: Engage with industry associations and New York legislators to oppose this bill, as it would effectively eliminate your ability to contract with independent owner-operators under New York unemployment, wage, and workers' compensation law.
S00162 / A07421
RECENT ACTIVITY
Last action: Jun 5, 2026 (24 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Authorizes the commissioner of labor and the workers' compensation board to issue stop-work orders; establishes procedure for the issuance of such orders; establishes penalties for failure to comply with such orders.
Authorizes the commissioner of labor and the workers' compensation board to issue stop-work orders; establishes procedure for the issuance of such orders; establishes penalties for failure to comply with such orders.
Status: S: COMMITTED TO RULES (Jun 05, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates new stop-work order authority for the NY Commissioner of Labor and Workers' Compensation Board, allowing them to halt all business operations at every affected site when aggregate wage violations exceed $1,000 or when workers' compensation coverage lapses — with penalties of $1,000–$5,000 per day for non-compliance. For logistics brokers, this is a direct operational threat: a disputed wage claim or a lapse in a carrier's workers' compensation coverage could trigger a stop-work order that freezes your freight operations with only 72 hours' notice. Although the legislature's 2026-27 term ended June 6, 2026 without this bill passing, it is likely to be reintroduced and warrants close attention given New York's aggressive enforcement posture toward labor compliance.
Recommended action: Brokers operating in New York should monitor this bill and engage with industry associations to oppose its expansion of stop-work authority, which could halt your business operations over wage or workers' compensation violations.
Last action: Apr 7, 2026 (83 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Enacts the "Empowering People in Rights Enforcement (EMPIRE) Worker Protection Act"; relates to the delegation of state enforcement authority to private actors; authorizes an affected employee, whistleblower, representative organization or an organizational deputy to initiate a public enforcement action on behalf of the commissioner for certain provisions of the labor law, or any regulation promulgated thereunder.
Enacts the "Empowering People in Rights Enforcement (EMPIRE) Worker Protection Act"; relates to the delegation of state enforcement authority to private actors; authorizes an affected employee, whistleblower, representative organization or an organizational deputy to initiate a public enforcement action on behalf of the commissioner for certain provisions of the labor law, or any regulation promulgated thereunder.
Status: S: REFERRED TO LABOR (Apr 07, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates a California PAGA-style private attorney general mechanism under New York labor law, allowing workers, whistleblowers, and labor organizations to sue employers directly for labor law violations — including worker misclassification — and collect 40% of civil penalties plus mandatory attorney fees. For logistics brokers using owner-operators in New York, this dramatically increases litigation exposure: any owner-operator who claims misclassification could trigger a private enforcement action without waiting for the state DOL to act. The $500-per-employee-per-pay-period penalty structure, combined with uncapped attorney fee awards and a broad definition of 'affected employee' that explicitly covers misclassification claimants, makes this a high-cost threat to the independent contractor model.
Recommended action: Brokers operating in New York should monitor this bill closely and engage with industry associations to oppose its passage if it resurfaces in the next legislative session.
Last action: Dec 24, 2025 (187 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Enacts the "Empowering People in Rights Enforcement (EMPIRE) Worker Protection Act"; relates to the delegation of state enforcement authority to private actors; authorizes an affected employee, whistleblower, representative organization or an organizational deputy to initiate a public enforcement action on behalf of the commissioner for certain provisions of the labor law, or any regulation promulgated thereunder.
Enacts the "Empowering People in Rights Enforcement (EMPIRE) Worker Protection Act"; relates to the delegation of state enforcement authority to private actors; authorizes an affected employee, whistleblower, representative organization or an organizational deputy to initiate a public enforcement action on behalf of the commissioner for certain provisions of the labor law, or any regulation promulgated thereunder.
Status: S: AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO LABOR / PRINT NUMBER 448C (Dec 24, 2025)
Assessment: This bill creates a California PAGA-style private attorney general mechanism under New York Labor Law, allowing misclassified workers (including owner-operators who claim employee status) to bring public enforcement actions against your business and collect civil penalties of $500 per affected employee per pay period per violation — with mandatory attorney fee shifting in favor of the plaintiff. The definition of 'affected employee' explicitly includes any person 'not classified by a business as an employee but who claims to be an employee,' meaning your owner-operators could immediately qualify as relators or the basis of a union-backed lawsuit without any prior agency finding of misclassification. The bill died when the 2025-26 legislative session ended June 6, 2026, but if reintroduced next session, it would represent one of the most significant enforcement liability expansions New York has proposed for broker-contractor relationships.
Recommended action: Engage with the NY Legislature or industry associations to oppose this bill, which dramatically expands enforcement exposure for logistics brokers by enabling private plaintiffs — including misclassification claimants — to sue on behalf of the state and collect civil penalties.
A03575 / S01180
RECENT ACTIVITY
Last action: Jun 3, 2026 (26 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Establishes an indirect source review for heavy distribution warehouse operations; requires the department of environmental conservation to conduct a study regarding zero-emissions zones.
Establishes an indirect source review for heavy distribution warehouse operations; requires the department of environmental conservation to conduct a study regarding zero-emissions zones.
Status: S: REPASSED SENATE / RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY (Jun 01, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates a mandatory indirect source review program requiring qualifying warehouses (50,000+ sq ft or 500,000+ sq ft in aggregate statewide) to obtain permits, submit air pollution mitigation plans, and meet extensive annual reporting requirements — including disclosure of subcontractor identities, vehicle trip data, and independent contractor counts — before new construction or modification can proceed. Carriers and brokers serving these facilities face potential operational disruption if warehouse clients cannot obtain permits or must restructure delivery patterns to comply with zero-emissions vehicle mandates and points-based mitigation requirements. The zero-emissions zone feasibility study in Section 4 could lead to future restrictions on diesel medium- and heavy-duty vehicles in delivery corridors, directly threatening the operational flexibility of owner-operators running your freight in New York.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and carriers serving New York distribution warehouses should engage with trade associations to oppose this bill, as its permitting, reporting, and mitigation mandates will increase operating costs and restrict truck access to key warehouse facilities.
Last action: Mar 9, 2026 (112 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Enacts the "NYS health care tax reform act"; establishes a public goods and medicaid subsidy surcharge on insurance corporations; establishes a public goods and medicaid subsidy surcharge on business corporations; establishes a public goods and medicaid subsidy surcharge on pass-through entities; relates to filing fee surcharges; relates to revenues to be included in the health care reform act resources fund; establishes a public goods and medicaid surcharge on misclassified workers.
Enacts the "NYS health care tax reform act"; establishes a public goods and medicaid subsidy surcharge on insurance corporations; establishes a public goods and medicaid subsidy surcharge on business corporations; establishes a public goods and medicaid subsidy surcharge on pass-through entities; relates to filing fee surcharges; relates to revenues to be included in the health care reform act resources fund; establishes a public goods and medicaid surcharge on misclassified workers.
Status: S: AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO HEALTH / PRINT NUMBER 8157A (Mar 09, 2026)
Assessment: This bill establishes a 'public goods and Medicaid surcharge on misclassified workers,' meaning if New York determines your owner-operators should have been classified as employees, your business faces an additional tax surcharge on top of existing reclassification penalties — creating a compounding financial liability. The bill also imposes a 10.2% franchise tax surcharge on corporations with 50+ employees that do not offer ACA-equivalent health benefits, which could affect brokers depending on their workforce size and benefits structure. The NY Legislature's 2026 session ended June 6, 2026 without enacting this bill, so it poses no immediate threat, but the misclassification surcharge mechanism signals the direction of future NY enforcement efforts and warrants continued monitoring.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should monitor this bill and engage with NY legislative contacts to oppose the misclassified worker surcharge provision, which creates a direct financial penalty tied to independent contractor relationships.
Last action: Feb 12, 2026 (137 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Limits the use of automatic data systems in connection with employment; requires an employer shall provide a written notice that an automatic data system is being used; provides remedies.
Limits the use of automatic data systems in connection with employment; requires an employer shall provide a written notice that an automatic data system is being used; provides remedies.
Assessment: This bill defines 'worker' to explicitly include independent contractors, meaning any ADS you use to assign loads, score performance, set productivity quotas, or trigger deactivation of owner-operators would trigger pre-use written notice requirements, data-access rights, mandatory human review before deactivation, and $500-per-violation civil penalties. If your dispatch or carrier-management platform uses machine learning or algorithmic scoring to make or assist employment-related decisions — including work assignment and productivity requirements — you face compliance obligations and enforcement exposure under this framework. The bill died in committee when the 2026-27 legislative term ended June 6, 2026, but the issue is live and likely to return.
Recommended action: Brokers using algorithmic dispatch, load-matching, performance scoring, or deactivation tools should engage against this bill to prevent burdensome notice, data-access, and human-review mandates from applying to their contractor relationships.
Last action: Jan 7, 2026 (173 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Authorizes certain penalties to be assessed against members of a limited liability company and partners of a limited liability partnership or partnership.
Authorizes certain penalties to be assessed against members of a limited liability company and partners of a limited liability partnership or partnership.
Status: S: REFERRED TO LABOR (Jan 07, 2026)
Assessment: This bill amends New York Workers' Compensation Law §26-a to extend personal, joint, and several liability for workers' compensation awards to members of LLCs and partners of LLPs and partnerships — not just corporate officers. If a broker's business entity is found to have an uninsured worker (including a misclassified owner-operator), individual members could be held personally liable for the full award. While the bill targets uninsured employers rather than directly redefining contractor status, it raises the personal financial stakes for broker-owners if any owner-operator relationship is later challenged and reclassified.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating as LLCs or partnerships in New York should monitor this bill, as it could expose individual members and partners to personal liability for workers' compensation awards if their business is found to have uninsured workers.
Last action: Jan 7, 2026 (173 days ago)
6/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Relates to actions or practices that establish or maintain a monopoly, monopsony or restraint of trade; authorizes a class action lawsuit in the state anti-trust law.
Relates to actions or practices that establish or maintain a monopoly, monopsony or restraint of trade; authorizes a class action lawsuit in the state anti-trust law.
Status: S: PASSED SENATE / DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY (May 06, 2026)
Assessment: This bill expands New York's antitrust law to cover monopsony (buyer-side market power) and creates a new 'abuse of dominant position' standard that explicitly includes conduct carried out 'through an independent contractor or other intermediary' — language that could theoretically implicate large freight brokers who control significant shares of regional freight markets. The bill also lists as presumptively illegal any restraint on a person's ability to 'engage in a profession, trade, or business of any kind,' which could be invoked to challenge non-compete or exclusivity clauses in broker-carrier contracts if a dominant firm is involved. However, the 100-or-fewer-employee exemption and the requirement that a buyer hold 30%+ market share to trigger the dominant-position presumption limit immediate exposure for most brokers, and the NY Legislature's 2025-26 term ended June 6, 2026 without passage.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill for any amendments or AG rulemaking that could target broker-carrier contracting arrangements or owner-operator pay practices under the new monopsony and dominant-position provisions.
Pennsylvania (PA) — 8 bills IN SESSION · thru Nov 30
Last action: Apr 9, 2025 (446 days ago)
9/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Providing for criteria for independent contractors and for powers and duties of the Department of Labor and Industry and the Secretary of Labor and Industry; and imposing penalties.
An Act providing for criteria for independent contractors and for powers and duties of the Department of Labor and Industry and the Secretary of Labor and Industry; and imposing penalties.
Status: S: Referred to Labor & Industry (Apr 09, 2025)
Assessment: This bill establishes a multi-factor independent contractor test for all non-construction industries in Pennsylvania, requiring workers to meet all three prongs — written project-specific contract, freedom from control, and customary independent business engagement with five additional sub-criteria — to qualify as ICs under workers' compensation and unemployment compensation law. Failure to meet this standard triggers civil penalties up to $2,500 per worker per violation, criminal charges up to a third-degree felony for repeat offenses, stop-work order authority, private rights of action with treble damages and attorney fees, and a 'acting in concert' provision that could expose your brokerage if a carrier you contract with is found to have misclassified workers. Owner-operators who do not maintain a separate business location, hold themselves out to multiple clients, or lack a proprietary business interest could fail this test, putting your broker-carrier contracting model directly at risk.
Recommended action: Engage Pennsylvania legislative contacts to oppose this bill or seek a transportation/freight broker exemption before it advances out of the Labor and Industry Committee.
Last action: Sep 10, 2025 (292 days ago)
8/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Requiring an employer to provide paid leave to an employee due to a climate-related emergency; establishing the Climate-related Emergency Paid Leave Fund; and imposing duties on the Department of Labor and Industry.
An Act requiring an employer to provide paid leave to an employee due to a climate-related emergency; establishing the Climate-related Emergency Paid Leave Fund; and imposing duties on the Department of Labor and Industry.
Status: H: Referred to Labor & Industry (Sep 10, 2025)
Assessment: This bill is doubly problematic for your business: it embeds a strict ABC test in the definition of 'employ,' meaning owner-operators you contract with could be reclassified as employees if they fail any of the three prongs — including the 'outside the usual course of business' prong that freight brokers routinely struggle to satisfy. If reclassification occurs, you become liable for up to 10 days of paid climate emergency leave per worker per year, plus up to $1,000 in administrative penalties per violation for non-compliance. The 50% fund reimbursement offers only partial relief and does nothing to offset the reclassification exposure that is the greater long-term threat to your independent contractor model.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating in Pennsylvania should oppose this bill and engage with the PA House Labor and Industry Committee to highlight the ABC test embedded in the worker definition and the direct compliance costs imposed on employers.
Last action: Jun 24, 2025 (370 days ago)
8/10 SCORESUPPORT
In liability and compensation, providing for registration of status as independent contractor.
An Act amending the act of June 2, 1915 (P.L.736, No.338), known as the Workers' Compensation Act, in liability and compensation, providing for registration of status as independent contractor.
Status: S: Referred to Labor & Industry (Jun 24, 2025)
Assessment: Pennsylvania SB 894 creates a voluntary registration system under the Workers' Compensation Act that allows your business to file an IC registration for owner-operators who are already classified as independent contractors for federal income tax purposes — once registered with a signed waiver and affidavit, you are explicitly exempt from workers' comp benefit liability and coverage requirements for that individual. This is a meaningful safe harbor: it provides documentary protection against workers' comp claims by registered ICs and eliminates the insurance-or-self-insure mandate that would otherwise apply. The bill explicitly does not disturb the Construction Workplace Misclassification Act, so its protections apply cleanly to freight and transportation arrangements.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should support this bill and urge passage, as it creates a formal registration mechanism that shields your business from workers' compensation liability for registered independent contractors.
Last action: Jun 24, 2026 (5 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Providing for employer disclosure when employee layoffs occur due to an employer's use of artificial intelligence or other technological change; and imposing civil penalties.
An Act providing for employer disclosure when employee layoffs occur due to an employer's use of artificial intelligence or other technological change; and imposing civil penalties.
Status: H: Referred to Labor & Industry (Jun 24, 2026)
Assessment: This bill's core purpose is AI layoff disclosure, but buried in its definitions is a three-prong ABC test: a worker is presumed an employee unless they are free from your control, perform work outside your usual business, and are customarily engaged in an independent trade — the same structure as California's AB5. If this definition of 'employ' is applied beyond the disclosure context, it would make it significantly harder for Pennsylvania-based brokers to defend owner-operator relationships as independent contractor arrangements. The civil penalties ($500–$5,000 per day) and Department of Labor and Industry enforcement authority add further compliance risk if your contractor relationships are scrutinized under this standard.
Recommended action: Brokers should monitor this bill closely because its embedded ABC test definition of 'employ' could be used to classify your owner-operators as employees under Pennsylvania law.
Last action: Apr 17, 2026 (73 days ago)
6/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Further providing for definitions; providing for notice and regulations; further providing for unfair labor practices and for representatives and elections; providing for initial collective bargaining agreement; further providing for prevention of unfair labor practices and for penalties; and imposing penalties.
An Act amending the act of June 1, 1937 (P.L.1168, No.294), known as the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Act, further providing for definitions; providing for notice and regulations; further providing for unfair labor practices and for representatives and elections; providing for initial collective bargaining agreement; further providing for prevention of unfair labor practices and for penalties; and imposing penalties.
Status: S: Referred to Labor & Industry (Apr 17, 2026)
Assessment: This bill strengthens union organizing rights under Pennsylvania's Labor Relations Act, including card-check certification when employers commit ULPs, mandatory interest arbitration for initial contracts, and banning mandatory arbitration agreements for collective claims — but these provisions apply only to 'employes,' and the bill explicitly excludes independent contractors from that definition using a two-prong control-plus-independent-business test. Your owner-operators should remain outside the bill's reach as long as they operate as genuine ICs, but the expanded unionization machinery increases risk if any of your carrier relationships are ever challenged as employment.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill for any amendments that could pull owner-operators into the 'employe' definition or broaden enforcement against misclassification, but no immediate action is required given the explicit IC exclusion.
Last action: Mar 30, 2026 (91 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Providing for legal protections from abusive work environments and for remedies.
An Act providing for legal protections from abusive work environments and for remedies.
Status: S: Referred to Labor & Industry (Mar 30, 2026)
Assessment: This bill's definition of 'employee' incorporates a three-prong ABC test — meaning your owner-operators could be reclassified as employees under this act unless they satisfy all three conditions, including performing work outside your usual course of business. If a misclassified owner-operator files a workplace bullying claim, your brokerage faces liability exposure including back pay, punitive damages, and attorney fees. The embedded ABC test is the core risk here — it's a broader employee definition than current Pennsylvania common law applies to broker-carrier relationships.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should monitor this bill and engage with PA legislators to clarify that independent owner-operators are excluded from the ABC test definition of 'employee' embedded in this bill.
Last action: Sep 2, 2025 (300 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Providing for regulations for employers to protect employees from heat-related injury or heat-related illness caused by heat stress; imposing duties on the Department of Labor and Industry and the Secretary of Labor and Industry; establishing the Heat Protection Enforcement Fund; and imposing penalties.
An Act providing for regulations for employers to protect employees from heat-related injury or heat-related illness caused by heat stress; imposing duties on the Department of Labor and Industry and the Secretary of Labor and Industry; establishing the Heat Protection Enforcement Fund; and imposing penalties.
Status: H: Referred to Labor & Industry (Sep 02, 2025)
Assessment: This bill embeds an ABC test directly into its definition of 'employ,' meaning any owner-operator or contractor who does not satisfy all three prongs — free from control, outside the usual course of business, and independently established — would be treated as your employee for purposes of heat protection compliance. Beyond the classification risk, the bill mandates paid rest breaks, heat monitoring, written prevention plans, annual paid training, and acclimatization protocols for all covered employees, creating layered operational and administrative costs if your drivers or yard workers are deemed covered. The heat index trigger of 80°F is a low threshold that would activate compliance obligations across a wide portion of the calendar year for outdoor freight operations in Pennsylvania.
Recommended action: Brokers with drivers or warehouse staff operating in Pennsylvania should monitor this bill and engage with industry associations to advocate for workable compliance thresholds and to ensure the ABC-test definition of 'employ' does not expose broker-carrier arrangements to reclassification risk.
Last action: Jun 18, 2025 (376 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Providing for interagency cooperation regarding employee misclassification; and establishing the Employee Misclassification Working Group.
An Act providing for interagency cooperation regarding employee misclassification; and establishing the Employee Misclassification Working Group.
Status: H: Re-reported as committed / Third consideration and final passage (108-95) (Jun 11, 2025) · S: Referred to Labor & Industry (Jun 18, 2025)
Assessment: This bill creates a formal interagency enforcement infrastructure in Pennsylvania by establishing a working group — including the Department of Labor and Industry, Department of Revenue, and Office of Attorney General — specifically to coordinate misclassification investigations, and enables cross-agency sharing of tax data to power compliance crossmatches. While it does not impose a new classification test or directly target your broker-carrier relationships, it materially increases the state's enforcement capacity and institutional focus on misclassification across all industries, including freight. If this working group becomes active, your use of independent owner-operators could face heightened audit and investigative scrutiny from multiple state agencies operating in coordinated fashion.
Recommended action: Engage with Pennsylvania legislative contacts to monitor whether this working group escalates into active enforcement campaigns targeting independent contractor arrangements in trucking and freight.
United States Congress (US) — 21 bills
Last action: Mar 5, 2026 (116 days ago)
9/10 SCORESUPPORT
21st Century Worker Act
A bill to clarify the classification of service provider payees as employees or independent contractors in Federal law.
Status: S: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Mar 05, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates a mandatory IC classification framework that strongly protects your owner-operator relationships: a service provider payee who is a business entity, a bona fide sole proprietor, or a formal bona fide contractor (defined by written contract, non-exclusivity, and unreimbursed expenses exceeding 5% of compensation) is classified as an independent contractor by operation of law — no multi-factor balancing test, no ABC prong to fail. The bill explicitly imports this standard into the FLSA and NLRA, replacing the economic-realities and common-law tests that regulators have used to reclassify contractors, and applies it to tax classification as well. The main caveat is passage risk: this is a Republican-sponsored Senate bill in a Congress where the majority is small and has shown some deference to labor interests, so advancement is uncertain — but it merits active support given the scope of protection it would provide.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should monitor this bill closely and engage with Senator Lee's office to support its advancement, as it would lock in favorable IC classification rules across the FLSA, NLRA, and tax law.
Last action: Oct 8, 2025 (264 days ago)
9/10 SCORESUPPORT
Employee Rights Act
A bill to reform the labor laws of the United States, and for other purposes.
Status: S: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Oct 08, 2025)
Assessment: Section 5 of this bill is directly valuable to your business: it establishes a two-prong behavioral-control test under the FLSA — an individual is an independent contractor if the hiring party does not control the details of how work is performed AND the individual bears entrepreneurial risk — and explicitly bars regulators from using insurance requirements, safety standards, or performance deadlines as factors pointing toward employment status, all of which are routine elements of broker-carrier contracts. The bill also imports this same standard into the NLRA and codifies a restrictive joint employer test requiring direct, actual, and immediate control over essential employment terms, which sharply limits the risk that a broker could be held liable for a carrier's labor practices. Sponsored entirely by Senate Republicans and referred to HELP Committee, this bill has a viable but uncertain path given the current majority, making it one to monitor closely and advocate for.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should actively support this bill and encourage their congressional contacts to advance it, as it would codify favorable IC and joint employer standards under both FLSA and NLRA.
Last action: Mar 5, 2025 (481 days ago)
9/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025
To amend the National Labor Relations Act, the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, and the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, and for other purposes.
Status: H: Introduced in House / Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce. (Mar 05, 2025)
Assessment: This bill hits your business from two directions simultaneously: Section 101(a) codifies an expansive joint employer standard under the NLRA that treats indirect, reserved, or theoretical control over working conditions as sufficient to make you a co-employer of your carriers' drivers — exposing you to union organizing campaigns and collective bargaining obligations you never intended. Section 101(b) imposes a three-prong ABC test for independent contractor status under the NLRA, meaning owner-operators who haul freight in your core business lanes would presumptively be classified as employees unless all three prongs are satisfied. This bill is sponsored entirely by House Democrats and has no realistic path to passage under the current Republican-controlled Congress, but its reintroduction signals continued legislative pressure and it could advance rapidly if political control shifts.
Recommended action: Brokers should oppose this bill and urge their Congressional representatives to vote against it, as it would dramatically expand joint employer liability and impose an ABC test under the NLRA that threatens your owner-operator contracting model.
Last action: Mar 5, 2025 (481 days ago)
9/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025
A bill to amend the National Labor Relations Act, the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, and the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, and for other purposes.
Status: S: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Mar 05, 2025)
Assessment: This bill imposes an ABC test under the NLRA, meaning your owner-operators could be reclassified as employees unless you prove all three prongs: they are free from your control, their work is outside your usual business, and they operate an independent trade — a nearly impossible standard for freight brokerage arrangements. It also codifies a broad joint employer standard under which indirect or reserved control alone — common in broker-carrier contracts — can make you a co-employer liable for a carrier's labor obligations. Sponsored entirely by Senate Democrats with no Republican co-sponsors, this bill has essentially no path to passage under the current Republican-controlled Congress, but it signals the regulatory direction Democrats will push if the political landscape shifts.
Recommended action: Brokers should monitor this bill and oppose it through industry associations, as it would codify an ABC test under the NLRA and expand joint employer liability in ways that directly threaten owner-operator relationships.
Last action: Feb 20, 2026 (129 days ago)
8/10 SCORESUPPORT
Modern Worker Empowerment Act
To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the National Labor Relations Act to clarify the standard for determining whether an individual is an employee, and for other purposes.
Status: H: Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-505. / Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 431. (Feb 20, 2026)
Assessment: This bill amends both the FLSA and NLRA to establish a two-prong control-based independent contractor test: if you don't exercise significant control over how work is performed, and the individual bears entrepreneurial risk and discretion, they are classified as an IC — not an employee. Critically, it explicitly prohibits regulators from using compliance requirements, insurance mandates, safety standards, or performance deadlines as factors to establish employment status, which directly shields standard broker-carrier contract terms from reclassification exposure. All five sponsors are Republicans, which aligns with the current House majority and White House, improving the bill's prospects, though its path through the Senate remains uncertain given the narrow majority and recent Republican accommodation of union priorities.
Recommended action: Engage your trade associations to support this bill, as it would codify a behavioral-control test into both the FLSA and NLRA that directly protects your owner-operator contracting model.
Last action: Jul 9, 2025 (355 days ago)
8/10 SCORESUPPORT
Modern Worker Empowerment Act
A bill to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to harmonize the definition of employee with the common law.
Status: S: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Jul 09, 2025)
Assessment: S. 2228 amends the FLSA's definition of 'employee' by anchoring it to 'usual common law rules' — meaning the behavioral control test (who controls how work is performed) replaces the multi-factor economic-realities test currently used by DOL to scrutinize independent contractor arrangements. For logistics brokers, this directly reduces misclassification exposure under federal wage-and-hour law, since the common law standard focuses on whether you direct the details of work — not economic dependence or exclusivity. The bill is sponsored by Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) and is in committee; with a Republican-controlled Senate and White House, it has a credible but not guaranteed path, and you should monitor its progress and co-sponsor list closely.
Recommended action: Engage your trade associations and urge support for S. 2228, as it would replace the FLSA's broad economic-realities test with a common law control test that makes it easier to maintain owner-operators as legitimate independent contractors.
Last action: Jul 8, 2025 (356 days ago)
8/10 SCORESUPPORT
Unlocking Benefits for Independent Workers Act
A bill to ensure that the provision of portable benefits to an individual is not considered in determining whether such individual is an employee of a person, and for other purposes.
Status: S: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Jul 08, 2025)
Assessment: This bill creates a federal safe harbor explicitly stating that offering portable benefits — including health, retirement, or other protections that travel with the worker — cannot be used as evidence of employment status under any federal law. For logistics brokers, this removes the chilling effect that currently discourages offering owner-operators any benefit-like support, since doing so risks being cited as evidence of an employment relationship. Sponsored entirely by Republicans (Cassidy, Tuberville, Scott, Budd) with a Republican-controlled Senate and White House, this bill has a realistic but not certain path forward — brokers should actively engage HELP Committee members to advance it.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should actively support this bill and engage with Senate HELP Committee members, as it directly protects the ability to offer portable benefits to owner-operators without triggering reclassification under any federal law.
Last action: Jun 26, 2025 (368 days ago)
8/10 SCORESUPPORT
Employee Rights Act
To reform the labor laws of the United States, and for other purposes.
Status: H: Introduced in House / Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. (Jun 26, 2025)
Assessment: Section 5 is the provision that matters most to your operations: it establishes a two-prong behavioral-control test under the FLSA — an individual is an IC if the hiring party does not exercise significant control over work details and the worker bears entrepreneurial risk — and it explicitly prohibits regulators from using insurance requirements, safety compliance mandates, or performance deadlines as factors pointing toward employee status, all of which are standard features of broker-carrier contracts. The bill also imports this same IC standard into the NLRA and restricts joint employer liability under both statutes to situations involving direct, actual, and immediate control over essential employment terms, sharply limiting exposure for brokers whose carriers employ their own drivers. Sponsored entirely by Republicans in the current majority, this bill has a realistic legislative path, though the state context note about GOP caution around union issues warrants monitoring as it moves through committee.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should support this bill and encourage their Congressional contacts to advance it, as it directly protects the independent contractor arrangements that power your business model.
Last action: Jan 3, 2025 (542 days ago)
8/10 SCORESUPPORT
Protect the Gig Economy Act of 2025
To amend Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to protect the "gig economy" and small businesses that operate in large part through contractor services from the threat of costly class action litigation, and for other purposes.
Status: H: Introduced in House / Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. (Jan 03, 2025)
Assessment: This bill amends Rule 23(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by adding a fifth prerequisite for class certification — explicitly barring any class action whose claim alleges misclassification of employees as independent contractors. For logistics brokers, this is a direct litigation shield: plaintiff attorneys could no longer aggregate thousands of owner-operator misclassification claims into a single class action, which is the mechanism that makes these suits existentially expensive to defend or settle. The bill was introduced by Rep. Biggs (R-AZ) on January 3, 2025, and while Republicans hold the House, Senate, and Presidency, its referral to the Judiciary Committee and the current GOP's occasional deference to union priorities means passage is uncertain — monitor sponsor support and committee activity closely.
Recommended action: Brokers should engage with their industry associations to support this bill, as it directly shields your contractor-based business model from the most financially damaging form of misclassification litigation.
Last action: Jun 2, 2026 (27 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Gig Is Up Act
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require payroll tax withholding on independent contractors of certain large businesses.
Status: H: Introduced in House / Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. (Jun 02, 2026)
Assessment: This bill would require any company with at least $100M in gross receipts that contracts with 10,000 or more individuals as independent contractors to treat all payments to those contractors as wages for payroll tax purposes — and then doubles the employer-side FICA rate under Section 3111, effectively penalizing large-scale IC use with a 2x Social Security and Medicare tax burden. Large freight brokers or platforms that meet both thresholds could face substantial new tax withholding obligations and administrative compliance costs without any change in the legal classification of their owner-operators. The bill is sponsored entirely by Democratic minority members, making passage under the current Republican-controlled Congress unlikely, but its targeting of high-volume IC arrangements makes it worth tracking.
Recommended action: Brokers that meet the $100M gross receipts and 10,000-contractor thresholds should monitor this bill and engage trade associations to oppose it, as it would impose payroll tax withholding obligations and double FICA rates on IC payments.
Last action: Apr 9, 2026 (81 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Fair Compensation for Truck Crash Victims Act
To increase the minimum levels of financial responsibility for transporting property, and to index future increases to changes in inflation relating to medical care.
Status: H: Introduced in House / Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. (Apr 09, 2026)
Assessment: This bill raises the federal minimum liability insurance requirement for property-carrying motor carriers from $750,000 to $5,000,000 — a 567% increase — and mandates automatic quinquennial inflation adjustments tied to medical care costs, meaning the floor will never stop rising. For logistics brokers, this directly increases the cost of doing business with owner-operators and small carriers who will face dramatically higher premiums, likely reducing the available carrier pool and driving up rates. All sponsors are House Democrats (Garcia, Tran, Huffman, Garamendi, Cohen, Johnson of Georgia) with no Republican co-sponsors, making passage extremely unlikely under the current Republican-controlled Congress and White House — but brokers should monitor this bill as it signals ongoing legislative pressure on carrier insurance minimums.
Recommended action: Brokers should engage trade associations to oppose this bill, as the insurance cost increase would cascade through carrier contracts and rate negotiations across your network.
Last action: Feb 20, 2026 (129 days ago)
7/10 SCORESUPPORT
Modern Worker Security Act
To ensure that the provision of portable benefits to an individual is not considered in determining whether such individual is an employee of a person.
Status: H: Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-506. / Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 432. (Feb 20, 2026)
Assessment: H.R. 1320 creates an explicit safe harbor under all federal law: providing portable benefits — including health insurance, paid leave, retirement savings, or workers' comp coverage — to an owner-operator cannot be used as evidence that the person is your employee. This directly addresses a real operational concern for brokers who want to offer benefit access to contracted carriers without triggering reclassification exposure. The bill is sponsored by two Republicans (Kiley and Messmer), which aligns with the current majority, giving it a credible — though not guaranteed — path forward; monitor committee movement and whether Senate companion legislation emerges.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should support this bill and encourage their congressional contacts to advance it, as it directly removes one of the reclassification risk factors that has historically been used to challenge independent contractor arrangements.
Last action: Jan 13, 2026 (167 days ago)
7/10 SCORESUPPORT
Save Local Business Act
To clarify the treatment of 2 or more employers as joint employers under the National Labor Relations Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
Status: H: Rule H. Res. 988 passed House. (Jan 13, 2026)
Assessment: This bill amends both the NLRA and FLSA to require that joint employer status can only be established when each employer directly, actually, and immediately exercises significant control over essential employment terms — eliminating liability based on indirect or reserved-but-unexercised control. For logistics brokers, this is meaningful protection: under current NLRB and DOL interpretations, brokers have faced joint employer exposure simply by setting delivery windows, specifying load requirements, or maintaining safety standards in carrier contracts. The bill is sponsored by a Republican (Comer) and referred to Education and Workforce, giving it a viable path in the current majority, though the GOP's recent softening toward unions introduces some uncertainty about floor momentum.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should support this bill and encourage their trade associations to lobby for its passage, as it directly limits the conditions under which a broker could be held liable as a joint employer of a carrier's drivers.
Last action: Jun 18, 2026 (11 days ago)
6/10 SCORESUPPORT
GHOSTRUCK Act Guarding Hours-of-Service Oversight and Stopping Tampering by Remote Unofficial Carrier Keeper Act
To amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize employees or authorized agents to edit or annotate electronic logging device records as long as such employee or agent is physically located in North America and the edit or annotation is subject to driver approval, and for other purposes.
Status: H: Introduced in House / Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. (Jun 18, 2026)
Assessment: This bill amends 49 U.S.C. §31137(b) to explicitly authorize motor carrier employees or agents to edit or annotate ELD records, provided the editor is physically located in North America and the driver approves the change — addressing a regulatory gap where offshore third-party ELD management services have operated in a legal gray zone. For brokers and carriers relying on owner-operators, this clarifies the chain of custody for hours-of-service records and reduces the risk of compliance violations stemming from unauthorized or foreign-based ELD edits. All six sponsors are House Republicans, giving the bill a reasonable path through committee in the current majority, though its narrow scope limits urgency.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and carriers should track this bill and engage sponsors to ensure the North America location requirement and driver approval safeguard are preserved, as these provisions protect against offshore ELD manipulation that could create compliance exposure for your operations.
Last action: Jan 13, 2026 (167 days ago)
6/10 SCORESUPPORT
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2988) to amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to specify requirements concerning the consideration of pecuniary and non-pecuniary factors, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2262) to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exclude certain activities from hours worked, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2270) to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exclude child and dependent care services and payments from the rate used to compute overtime compensation; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2312) to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to revise the definition of the term ''tipped employee'', and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4366) to clarify the treatment of 2 or more employers as joint employers under the National Labor Relations Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2988) to amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to specify requirements concerning the consideration of pecuniary and non-pecuniary factors, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2262) to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exclude certain activities from hours worked, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2270) to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exclude child and dependent care services and payments from the rate used to compute overtime compensation; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2312) to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to revise the definition of the term ''tipped employee'', and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4366) to clarify the treatment of 2 or more employers as joint employers under the National Labor Relations Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
Status: H: Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H670-676) / DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 988. / POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 988, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Leger Fernandez demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced. / Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H67 (Jan 13, 2026)
Assessment: This is a procedural rule resolution setting the floor terms for debate on five underlying bills — the substantive impact comes from those bills, not this resolution itself. Most consequential for your business is H.R. 4366, which aims to clarify joint employer treatment under both the NLRA and FLSA; a broker-friendly definition would limit your liability for the employment practices of the owner-operators and carriers you contract with. The other bills address ERISA ESG investment factors, FLSA hours-worked exclusions, overtime calculation, and tipped employee definitions — none of which directly restructure the broker-carrier independent contractor relationship, though the hours-worked and overtime provisions could affect operational cost benchmarks if carriers treat drivers as employees.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should monitor H.R. 4366 in particular and signal support, as a favorable joint employer clarification under the NLRA and FLSA would reduce your exposure for carrier labor practices.
Last action: Sep 18, 2025 (284 days ago)
6/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Predatory Truck Leasing Prevention Act of 2025
To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit the use of predatory commercial motor vehicle lease-purchase programs by certain motor carriers, and for other purposes.
Status: H: Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit. (Sep 18, 2025)
Assessment: This bill directs the Secretary of Transportation to promulgate regulations prohibiting 'predatory' commercial motor vehicle lease-purchase programs — defined to include motor carrier control over a driver's work, compensation, debts, and equity in the leased truck. While the bill targets motor carrier-driver lease-purchase arrangements rather than broker-carrier relationships directly, the broad definitional language around carrier 'control' over work and compensation could create regulatory precedent that bleeds into how owner-operator arrangements are evaluated. The bill is sponsored by Rep. Brownley, a Democrat in the minority party, giving it virtually no path to enactment in the current Republican-controlled Congress — but the rulemaking framework it proposes warrants tracking if political dynamics shift.
Recommended action: Monitor rulemaking closely, as the DOT's regulatory definition of 'predatory' lease-purchase programs could be written broadly enough to restrict standard broker-carrier contracting practices or owner-operator lease arrangements your business relies on.
Last action: Sep 10, 2025 (292 days ago)
6/10 SCORESUPPORT
American Franchise Act
To preserve the franchise business model.
Status: H: Introduced in House / Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce. (Sep 10, 2025)
Assessment: This bill amends the NLRA and FLSA to restrict joint employer liability for franchisors to situations involving 'substantial direct and immediate control' over essential employment terms — explicitly excluding brand standards, training materials, and minimum staffing requirements from triggering joint employer status. While the bill targets franchise relationships rather than broker-carrier arrangements directly, the narrow joint employer standard it establishes is the same legal framework brokers rely on to avoid liability for owner-operator labor practices. The bill has bipartisan sponsorship (including several Democrats), but its path is uncertain given the small Republican majority and the noted recent GOP deference to union interests.
Recommended action: Brokers should monitor this bill and consider supporting it, as its joint employer restrictions under the NLRA and FLSA establish a favorable precedent that could be extended to broker-carrier relationships.
Last action: Aug 5, 2025 (328 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Warehouse Worker Protection Act
To establish protections for warehouse workers, and for other purposes.
Status: H: Introduced in House / Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. (Aug 05, 2025)
Assessment: This bill defines 'covered employer' to explicitly include contractors, subcontractors, and independent contractors employing workers at warehouse and distribution facilities — meaning if your brokerage or a carrier you contract with operates at a NAICS 493 or 492110 facility with 200+ employees, you could be swept into quota disclosure mandates, OSHA ergonomic standards, and anti-retaliation enforcement. The NLRA amendments and OSHA rulemaking provisions (Titles II and III) add additional union organizing and workplace safety compliance layers that could burden carrier operations at those facilities. Sponsored predominantly by minority-party Democrats with only one Republican co-sponsor (Lawler), this bill has no realistic path to passage under the current Republican-controlled Congress, but the joint-liability framing for contractors warrants ongoing monitoring.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers that operate or contract with warehouse and distribution facilities (NAICS 493, 492110) should monitor this bill and engage trade associations to oppose provisions that extend joint liability to contractors and subcontractors operating at covered facilities.
Last action: Jul 31, 2025 (333 days ago)
6/10 SCORENEUTRAL
Warehouse Worker Protection Act
A bill to establish protections for warehouse workers, and for other purposes.
Status: S: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Jul 31, 2025)
Assessment: This bill targets warehouse facilities (NAICS codes 493, 423, 424, 454110, 492110) and explicitly includes 'independent contractors' within the definition of 'covered employer,' meaning if you arrange freight or operate distribution through contracted entities at covered facilities, your operations could fall under its quota transparency, work-speed data disclosure, and OSHA ergonomic standard requirements. The bill also amends the NLRA and establishes a new DOL enforcement office with rulemaking authority — creating a compliance infrastructure that could expand to affect how you manage carrier performance metrics. However, the bill is sponsored primarily by Democrats (Markey, Sanders, Warren, Padilla) with limited Republican co-sponsors (Hawley, Marshall), and with Republicans controlling both chambers and the presidency, this bill has little near-term path to enactment.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill for amendments or companion House legislation, but do not prioritize active opposition given its low probability of passage under current Republican leadership.
Last action: Jul 28, 2025 (336 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Empowering App-Based Workers Act
A bill to promote transparency and accountability in covered digital labor platform work, and for other purposes.
Status: H: Introduced in House / Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce. (Dec 11, 2025) · S: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Jul 28, 2025)
Assessment: This bill targets 'covered digital labor platform providers' — a definition broad enough to sweep in freight brokers and load boards that dispatch owner-operators through app-based systems, exposing you to mandatory algorithmic transparency disclosures, adverse-action notice requirements, and a 25% take-rate cap on what platforms retain versus what workers receive. The findings explicitly call out warehousing and last-mile delivery as covered sectors and frame algorithmic management as enabling independent contractor misclassification — signaling that enforcement and reclassification exposure follow. Introduced by three Democratic senators (Schatz, Murphy, Baldwin) and referred to HELP Committee in a Republican-controlled Senate, this bill has no realistic path to enactment in the 119th Congress but establishes a policy template that could resurface and should be tracked.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers and freight platforms using app-based dispatch models should monitor this bill and engage trade associations to push back on transparency mandates and take-rate caps that could disrupt how you price and manage carrier relationships.
Last action: Feb 12, 2026 (137 days ago)
5/10 SCOREOPPOSE
BE HEARD in the Workplace Act Bringing an End to Harassment by Enhancing Accountability and Rejecting Discrimination in the Workplace Act
A bill to prevent discrimination, including harassment, in employment.
Status: H: Introduced in House / Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, House Administration, Oversight and Government Reform, and Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. (Feb 13, 2026) · S: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Feb 12, 2026)
Assessment: Section 301 explicitly extends anti-discrimination and harassment protections to independent contractors, meaning your owner-operators could bring claims against your brokerage under federal civil rights law — a significant new liability exposure. Section 303 prohibits mandatory arbitration agreements for discrimination claims, removing a key dispute-resolution tool brokers rely on in contractor agreements. Section 101 also mandates written nondiscrimination policies with specific content requirements and penalties up to $5,000 per willful violation, adding a compliance burden to your operations. However, this bill is sponsored entirely by Democratic senators in a Republican-controlled Congress, making near-term passage unlikely — but the IC liability expansion in Section 301 warrants tracking if political dynamics shift.
Recommended action: Monitor this bill for its Section 301 independent contractor provisions, mandatory policy and training requirements, and arbitration ban, and engage industry associations to oppose if it advances.
Virginia (VA) — 4 bills SESSION ENDED · Mar 14
Last action: Apr 22, 2026 (68 days ago)
8/10 SCOREENACTED
Minimum wage and overtime wages; payment, of wages, misclassification of workers, civil actions.
Labor and employment; payment of wages; minimum wage and overtime wages; misclassification of workers; prevailing wage rate; civil actions. Provides that an employer that violates provisions relating to minimum wage, overtime wages provisions, the misclassification of workers, or the prevailing wage rate is subject to civil actions for the applicable remedies, damages, or other relief available in an action brought pursuant to the civil action provisions currently available for the nonpayment of wages. Such provisions currently available provide that an employee may bring an action in a court of competent jurisdiction to recover payment of the wages, and the court is required to award the wages owed, an additional equal amount as liquidated damages, plus prejudgment interest thereon, and reasonable attorney fees and costs. Under current law, if the court finds that the employer knowingly failed to pay wages to an employee, the court is required to award the employee an amount equal to triple the amount of wages due and reasonable attorney fees and costs. The bill permits the Commissioner of Labor and Industry to refer matters relating to the bill's provisions to the Attorney General for enforcement through civil action.
Status: H: House concurred in Governor's recommendation (64-Y 36-N 0-A) / Reenrolled / Reenrolled bill text (HB238ER2) / Signed by Speaker (Apr 22, 2026) · S: Senate concurred in Governor's recommendation (21-Y 18-N 0-A) / Signed by President (Apr 22, 2026)
Assessment: This bill expands civil remedies — including liquidated damages equal to wages owed, triple damages for knowing violations, and attorney fees — to misclassification claims under § 40.1-28.7:7, which uses an IRS common-law multi-factor test to determine independent contractor status. While the IRS test is generally more favorable than an ABC test, the dramatically increased penalty exposure (up to 3x wages plus attorney fees) raises the financial stakes of any misclassification finding involving your owner-operators. The bill also extends joint-and-several liability down construction subcontractor chains and authorizes the Attorney General to pursue civil enforcement, signaling a broader enforcement posture that could reach transportation arrangements if regulators characterize broker-carrier relationships as employment.
Last action: Mar 14, 2026 (107 days ago)
7/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Minimum wage and overtime wages; payment, misclassification of workers, civil actions.
Labor and employment; payment of wages; minimum wage and overtime wages; misclassification of workers; prevailing wage rate; civil actions. Provides that an employer that violates provisions relating to minimum wage, overtime wages provisions, the misclassification of workers, or the prevailing wage rate is liable to the employee for the applicable remedies, damages, or other relief available in an action brought pursuant to the civil action provisions currently available for the nonpayment of wages. Such provisions currently available provide that an employee may bring an action in a court of competent jurisdiction to recover payment of the wages, and the court is required to award the wages owed, an additional equal amount as liquidated damages, plus prejudgment interest thereon, and reasonable attorney fees and costs. Under current law, if the court finds that the employer knowingly failed to pay wages to an employee, the court is required to award the employee an amount equal to triple the amount of wages due and reasonable attorney fees and costs.
Status: H: Conference report agreed to by House (62-Y 35-N 0-A) (Mar 14, 2026) · S: Fiscal Impact statement From VCSC (3/14/2026 2:49 pm) / Conference report rejected by Senate (16-Y 21-N 0-A) / No further action taken / Failed to Pass from conference (Mar 14, 2026)
Assessment: This bill expands civil liability for worker misclassification under Virginia Code § 40.1-28.7:7 by making employers liable for the full remedies available under § 40.1-29(J) — including liquidated damages equal to wages owed and triple damages for knowing violations — on top of existing misclassification damages. The IRS common-law control test is retained as the standard for IC status, which is relatively favorable to brokers, but the heightened penalty exposure increases litigation risk if an owner-operator is deemed misclassified. Brokers using Virginia-based independent carriers should review their contractor agreements carefully, as this bill substantially raises the financial stakes of any misclassification finding.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should monitor this bill and engage with Virginia legislators to ensure that expanded misclassification civil remedies and liquidated damages provisions are not applied to broker-carrier independent contractor arrangements.
Last action: Feb 11, 2026 (138 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Corporate welfare tax; imposes on large employers a tax equal to 100% of qualified employee benefit.
Corporate welfare tax. Imposes on large employers, as defined in the bill, a corporate welfare tax equal to 100 percent of the qualified employee benefits received by any employees of such large employer residing in the Commonwealth. The bill directs the Department of Taxation to obtain identifying data for individuals receiving qualified federal benefits, as defined by the bill, from the Department of Social Services pursuant to an interagency agreement and to compare such data to employment rosters received quarterly from large employers to determine the amount of qualified federal benefits received by employees of such large employers. The bill also prohibits an employer, in connection with the selection or referral of applicants or candidates for employment, to make inquiries or otherwise seek information relating to whether such applicant receives qualified federal benefits.
Status: H: Continued to next session in Finance (Voice Vote) (Feb 11, 2026)
Assessment: This Virginia bill defines 'employee' for corporate welfare tax purposes to include independent contractors and their employees — meaning owner-operators you place freight with could be counted when calculating your tax liability if your company qualifies as a 'large employer' (500+ employees). If enacted, you could face a tax equal to 100% of any means-tested federal benefits (SNAP, Medicaid, etc.) received by those contractors, effectively penalizing your use of the IC model. The bill also prohibits asking applicants whether they receive federal benefits, adding a new compliance obligation to your hiring process.
Recommended action: Brokers should monitor this bill and oppose it if it advances, as the broad definition of 'employee' explicitly includes independent contractors and their employees, potentially exposing your business to a 100% corporate welfare tax on public benefits received by owner-operators you contract with.
Last action: Apr 22, 2026 (68 days ago)
5/10 SCOREENACTED
Virginia Public Procurement Act; additional public works contract requirements.
Virginia Public Procurement Act; additional public works contract requirements; report. Provides that public bodies shall require the contractor and its subcontractors for any construction contract, as defined in the bill, to complete certain safety training programs and maintain records of compliance with applicable laws. The bill requires a prime contractor to obtain written authorization from a state public body before any party to a construction contract provides remuneration to more than one independent contractor for each contractor, subcontractor, or party to such contract when such contract is valued at greater than $5 million. If a construction contract with a local public body is valued at greater than $5 million the prime contractor shall provide written notification to the local public body justifying remuneration to any independent contractor. The foregoing provisions of the bill not apply to transportation-relatedconstruction projects. Such provisions have a delayed effective date of July 1, 2027.Effective in due course, the bill requires the Secretary of Labor to conduct an 18-month evaluation regarding the feasibility of requiring public bodies to hire apprentices on public works contracts. The bill also directs the Department of General Services and the Department of Labor and Industry to develop guidelines to assist state public bodies in making the determinations required to issue an authorization allowing a contractor, subcontractor, or other party to a public works contract to provide remuneration to an independent contractor in connection with such contract. The Department of General Services shall publish such guidelines on its website no later than July 1, 2027. This bill is identical to SB 324.
Status: H: House concurred in Governor's recommendation (65-Y 35-N 0-A) / Reenrolled bill text (HB1046ER2) / Signed by Speaker (Apr 22, 2026) · S: Senate concurred in Governor's recommendation (21-Y 18-N 0-A) / Signed by President (Apr 22, 2026)
Assessment: This bill imposes an ABC-style three-prong definition of 'Employee' and requires prior written authorization from a public body before any party on a capital outlay project can engage an independent contractor — a direct restriction on IC use that would be highly relevant to your business. However, the bill explicitly exempts transportation-related construction projects from its IC authorization and apprenticeship requirements, which limits direct exposure for logistics brokers and owner-operators moving freight. Watch for any narrowing of that transportation exemption in committee amendments, as the core IC authorization mechanism in subsection F could create serious compliance burdens if it were ever extended beyond construction into freight operations.
West Virginia (WV) — 8 bills SESSION ENDED · Mar 14
Last action: Apr 1, 2026 (89 days ago)
8/10 SCOREENACTED
Workforce Readiness and Opportunity Act
The purpose of this bill is all related to the Workforce Readiness and Opportunity Initiatives Act including by establishing the West Virginia Micro-Credential Program, expanding the apprenticeship training tax credit, allowing for independent contractors to have portable benefits which hiring parties can contribute to without altering the nature of the relationship, providing for tax treatment of portable benefits, and eliminating barriers to professional licensures for military trained applicants.
Status: H: Approved by Governor 4/1/2026 - House Journal (Mar 14, 2026) · S: Approved by Governor 4/1/2026 (Apr 01, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates a Voluntary Portable Benefits Plan framework under WV Code §21-18-1 et seq. that explicitly allows hiring parties — including logistics brokers — to contribute to benefits for independent contractors without altering the contractor's classification status, directly addressing the reclassification risk that currently deters brokers from offering any benefits to owner-operators. The bill also provides state income and corporate tax deductions for both the contributing hiring party and the receiving contractor, making the arrangement financially advantageous for your business. This is a pro-broker safe harbor provision that reduces legal exposure while improving your ability to attract and retain quality owner-operators in West Virginia's freight market.
Last action: Feb 23, 2026 (126 days ago)
8/10 SCORESUPPORT
Classifying independent contractors and employees
The purpose of this bill is to align the state classifications of independent contractor and employee with the Internal Revenue Service classifications.
Status: S: Filed for introduction / To Judiciary / Introduced in Senate / To Judiciary (Feb 23, 2026)
Assessment: This bill amends WV §21-5I-4 to establish a multi-factor control-based test for IC classification — anchored to IRS Rev. Ruling 87-41's behavioral-control framework — across workers' compensation, unemployment compensation, wage payment, and Human Rights Act statutes simultaneously. For brokers contracting with owner-operators, the key protections are: mandatory resolution of ambiguity in favor of IC status, explicit carve-outs ensuring that safety equipment mandates and compliance-driven oversight do not convert an IC relationship into employment, and a safe harbor for workers who satisfy three or more of nine enumerated IC criteria. This directly reduces your exposure to reclassification claims in West Virginia and strengthens the legal foundation for your owner-operator contracting model.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating in West Virginia should actively support this bill, as it codifies a favorable control-based IC classification standard and explicitly resolves ambiguity in favor of independent contractor status across workers' compensation, unemployment, wage, and Human Rights Act proceedings.
Last action: Jan 28, 2026 (152 days ago)
8/10 SCORESUPPORT
Workforce Readiness and Opportunity Act
The purpose of this bill is all related to the Workforce Readiness and Opportunity Initiatives Act including by establishing the West Virginia Micro-Credential Program, expanding the apprenticeship training tax credit, allowing for independent contractors to have portable benefits which hiring parties can contribute to without altering the nature of the relationship, providing for tax treatment of portable benefits, and eliminating barriers to professional licensures for military trained applicants.
Status: H: By substitute, do pass, but first to Finance / To House Finance (Jan 28, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates West Virginia's Voluntary Portable Benefits Plan Act, which explicitly states that a hiring party's contributions to a portable benefit plan for an independent contractor do not alter or create an employer-employee relationship — directly addressing the reclassification risk that has prevented brokers from offering benefits to owner-operators. The bill also provides state income and corporate tax deductions for contributions made by hiring parties and excludes those contributions from the independent contractor's gross income, creating a financial incentive for brokers to participate. For your business, this means you can contribute to health, disability, retirement, or income replacement benefits for contracted owner-operators without triggering reclassification liability under West Virginia law.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should support this bill and encourage its passage, as it explicitly protects IC status when contributing to portable benefits and reduces the financial barrier that has historically deterred brokers from offering any benefits to owner-operators.
Last action: Apr 1, 2026 (89 days ago)
7/10 SCOREENACTED
Relating to the creation of the Portable Benefit Account Act
The purpose of this bill is to create the Portable Benefit Account Act.
Status: H: Approved by Governor 4/1/2026 (Apr 01, 2026) · S: On 3rd reading with right to amend / Read 3rd time / Finance comm amendment withdrawn by unanimous consent / Banking and Insurance com amendment adopted (Voice vote) / Passed Senate (Roll No. 676) / Title amendment adopted / Senate requests House to concur / House Message received / Senate concurred in House amendments and passed bill (Roll No. 708) / Communicated to House / Completed legislative action / To Governor 3/25/2026 - Senate Journal / Approved by Governor 4/1/2026 - Senate Journal (Mar 14, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates a voluntary portable benefit account framework in West Virginia and includes a critical safe harbor provision: contributions to a portable benefit account cannot be used as a criterion for determining worker employment classification. This directly protects your business if you or your carriers choose to offer benefit contributions to owner-operators without triggering reclassification risk. The opt-in, written-agreement requirement for payroll withholding also ensures the arrangement remains clearly voluntary, reinforcing independent contractor status.
Last action: Feb 3, 2026 (146 days ago)
7/10 SCORESUPPORT
Relating to portable benefit plans
The purpose of this bill is to provide for voluntary portable insurance plans.
Status: H: Filed for introduction / To Finance / Introduced in House / To House Finance (Feb 03, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates a voluntary state-sponsored portable insurance benefit plan for West Virginia independent contractors, and critically includes two provisions that directly benefit your business: Section 5-16E-3(b)(2) prohibits using a hiring party's contributions to the plan as a criterion for determining employment classification, and Section 5-16E-3(c) bars courts from construing contributions by internet or app-based companies as evidence of an employment relationship for workers' compensation purposes. These safe harbor protections mean your company can voluntarily contribute to portable benefits for owner-operators without triggering reclassification risk under West Virginia law. This is the type of portable benefits framework that strengthens the independent contractor model rather than threatening it.
Recommended action: Brokers should support this bill and encourage its passage, as it explicitly protects IC status by barring hiring-party contributions from being used as evidence of an employment relationship.
Last action: Jan 20, 2026 (160 days ago)
7/10 SCORESUPPORT
Taxpayer Protection Act
The purpose of this bill is to ensure individual taxpayers are not misclassified.
Status: H: Filed for introduction / To Finance / Introduced in House / To House Finance (Jan 20, 2026)
Assessment: This West Virginia bill creates a state-level ABC test under the personal income tax code, but unlike typical anti-broker ABC tests, it is structured in favor of independent contractor status: the worker is presumed to be an IC unless the hiring entity can prove all three prongs establishing an employment relationship — control, direction, and economic responsibility to the principal. For logistics brokers using owner-operators in West Virginia, this presumption of IC status is a meaningful protection against state tax-driven reclassification, as the burden of proof falls on the party claiming employment rather than on the IC relationship. However, the bill still introduces a structured multi-factor test into state law that the Tax Commissioner will administer, so brokers should monitor how the agency interprets 'degree of control' and 'economically responsible' in practice.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers should engage with West Virginia legislators to support this bill, as its ABC test is structured to presume independent contractor status rather than employment — a meaningful protection for owner-operator arrangements.
Last action: Jan 14, 2026 (166 days ago)
7/10 SCORESUPPORT
Creating Voluntary Portable Benefit Account Act
The purpose of this bill is to create the Voluntary Portable Benefit Account Act. The bill provides for a short title. The bill creates definitions. Finally, the bill provides for the enactment of the article for the creation of voluntary portable benefit accounts.
Status: S: Filed for introduction / To Banking and Insurance / Introduced in Senate / To Banking and Insurance (Jan 14, 2026)
Assessment: This bill creates a voluntary portable benefit account framework in West Virginia and includes a direct protection that matters to your business: contributions to these accounts cannot be used as a factor in determining worker classification. Section 31A-10-3(c) explicitly shields hiring parties — including brokers and carriers — from reclassification risk when funding benefits for independent contractors. This is a pro-IC safeguard that removes a key litigation and audit vulnerability if you choose to offer benefit contributions to owner-operators.
Recommended action: Logistics brokers operating in West Virginia should support this bill and encourage its passage, as it explicitly protects IC status when contributing to worker benefit accounts.
Last action: Feb 3, 2026 (146 days ago)
6/10 SCOREOPPOSE
Employer discriminatory practices
The purpose of this bill is to include certain employers with two or more employees subject to actions for discriminatory practices before the human rights commission; to include individual independent contractors in the definition of "employee"; and to increase the time period in which to bring an action before the human rights commission to three years after the alleged act of discrimination.
Status: H: Filed for introduction / To Judiciary / Introduced in House / To House Judiciary (Feb 03, 2026)
Assessment: This bill redefines 'employee' under West Virginia's Human Rights Act to explicitly include individuals performing work under independent contracts, meaning owner-operators and independent carriers you contract with could bring discrimination claims against your brokerage before the Human Rights Commission. The employer threshold also drops from 12 to 2 employees, pulling smaller brokerages into coverage, and the filing window triples from 365 days to three years — extending the period of litigation exposure for each contractor relationship. Combined, these changes mean your IC arrangements with owner-operators could generate anti-discrimination liability that was previously limited to traditional employment relationships.
Recommended action: Brokers should monitor this bill and consider opposing its expansion of 'employee' to include independent contractors under West Virginia's Human Rights Commission jurisdiction, which creates new discrimination liability exposure for broker-contractor relationships.